My Assistant
Lot Of Rocks |
Apr 1 2005, 09:19 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
This mosaic of 4 Panoramic frames from Sol442 show a strong increase in density of rocks, even big ones! Don't know if could be an issue for further movements toward the hill top?
-------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Guest_BruceMoomaw_* |
Apr 10 2005, 02:38 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Guests |
Getting back for a moment to whether humans should be put on the surface of Mars: if it wasn't for the biocontamination issue, the argument for going that small remaining distance if you've already put them into Mars orbit would be extremely strong, thanks to the fact that Mars (unlike the Moon) has easily accessible resources (atmosphere and ground ice) that can be used to sustain a surface crew but not an orbiting crew.
But the biocontamination argument against it is still extremely strong. If one argues that Mars is already contaminated by terrestrial organisms transferred from Earth to Mars via meteorite, then the main scientific argument for running up the huge expense of sending humans to Mars promptly collapses too. And if one argues that it's unlikely that manned crews would contaminate more than a very small slice of Mars: the problem is that they WILL, at an absolute minimum, seriously contaminate every single local part of the planet that they actually try to examine scientifically. For all these reasons -- more than the expense of the expedition, although the latter is also a serious problem -- I think it will be a very long time before we send humans to the surface of Mars. By the way, keep in mind that if you're going to adopt the alternative of just putting a crew into orbit around Mars and having them teleoperate surface-exploration robots without that maddening radio time lag, you can explore Venus in exactly the same way. And it's closer (if less scientifically interesting, and more exposed to solar particle radiation and X-rays...) |
|
|
|
Apr 10 2005, 02:54 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 133 Joined: 29-January 05 Member No.: 161 |
QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Apr 10 2005, 02:38 PM) the problem is that they WILL, at an absolute minimum, seriously contaminate every single local part of the planet that they actually try to examine scientifically. And what exactly is the basis for assuming this? That earth DNA will somehow jump into Martian DNA (if it exists) and modify it to such an extent that it can't be detected? Or that earth organisms will suddenly thrive in the harsh Martian environment, far harsher than any on Earth, and destroy all Martian life? Or that Redpeace have just issued a press release? -------------------- |
|
|
|
dilo Lot Of Rocks Apr 1 2005, 09:19 PM
Sunspot QUOTE (dilo @ Apr 1 2005, 10:19 PM)This mosai... Apr 1 2005, 10:18 PM
Tman I have also some reservations. This spiky high roc... Apr 2 2005, 08:20 AM
ElkGroveDan QUOTE (Tman @ Apr 2 2005, 08:20 AM)I have als... Apr 2 2005, 04:15 PM
djellison QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Apr 2 2005, 04:15 PM)can... Apr 2 2005, 05:16 PM
Jeff7 And remember too, the rover was designed to be abl... Apr 2 2005, 05:35 PM
Buck Galaxy All these sharp rocks will make designing a safe M... Apr 3 2005, 06:28 AM
ElkGroveDan QUOTE (Buck Galaxy @ Apr 3 2005, 06:28 AM)All... Apr 3 2005, 03:17 PM
BruceMoomaw EVA suits present a severe problem for manned Mars... Apr 3 2005, 12:39 PM
Buck Galaxy "...with suited-up EVAs limited to the absolu... Apr 4 2005, 02:22 AM
dilo Now it seems to me that Spirit is avoiding the den... Apr 3 2005, 05:11 PM
Sunspot Which sol are those images of Spirit's tracks ... Apr 3 2005, 06:37 PM
dilo QUOTE (Sunspot @ Apr 3 2005, 06:37 PM)Which s... Apr 4 2005, 04:27 AM
BruceMoomaw "About EVA activity, it seems to me foolish t... Apr 4 2005, 06:40 AM
Buck Galaxy QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Apr 4 2005, 06:40 AM)... Apr 4 2005, 07:36 AM
Tman QUOTE (Buck Galaxy @ Apr 4 2005, 07:36 AM)So ... Apr 4 2005, 08:38 AM
paxdan QUOTE (Buck Galaxy @ Apr 4 2005, 08:36 AM)Sur... Apr 4 2005, 10:28 AM
tedstryk
Well, yes, but if we did it now, there is a chan... Apr 8 2005, 02:23 PM
djellison QUOTE Surely a base or two won't contaminate a... Apr 4 2005, 07:42 AM
BruceMoomaw Buck Galaxy, April 4: "So why not set aside ... Apr 6 2005, 12:56 PM
BruceMoomaw Paxdan: "...If there is life on Mars, searchi... Apr 6 2005, 01:03 PM
Chmee I think not allowing human EVA's is a bit para... Apr 6 2005, 05:15 PM
Mongo Considering the huge cost of a manned Mars program... Apr 6 2005, 08:30 PM
Gray Robert Ballard has an interesting story about his ... Apr 8 2005, 01:07 PM
wyogold I think you are missing an important point about d... Apr 9 2005, 05:17 AM
Bill Harris To have humans _on_ Mars is more than a PR stunt (... Apr 9 2005, 07:34 AM
dvandorn QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Apr 9 2005, 02:34 AM)To ... Apr 9 2005, 07:58 AM
Jeff7 QUOTE (dvandorn @ Apr 9 2005, 02:58 AM)Actual... Apr 9 2005, 08:40 AM
Mode5 A spacecraft in orbit with humans on board will be... Apr 9 2005, 09:20 AM
cIclops The difference between remote operations from Eart... Apr 9 2005, 10:43 AM
TheChemist Todays PanCam depository on Exploratorium consists... Apr 9 2005, 03:11 PM
dilo QUOTE (TheChemist @ Apr 9 2005, 03:11 PM)Toda... Apr 9 2005, 09:00 PM
Mode5 QUOTE (dilo @ Apr 9 2005, 09:00 PM)QUOTE (The... Apr 10 2005, 11:15 PM
dilo QUOTE (Mode5 @ Apr 10 2005, 11:15 PM)Great pi... Apr 13 2005, 05:48 AM
Mode5 QUOTE (dilo @ Apr 13 2005, 05:48 AM)QUOTE (Mo... Apr 13 2005, 07:36 AM
Bill Harris QUOTE Actually, no. Keeping a human crew alive and... Apr 10 2005, 10:16 AM

Mode5 QUOTE (cIclops @ Apr 10 2005, 02:54 PM)QUOTE ... Apr 11 2005, 12:48 AM
David QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Apr 10 2005, 02:38 PM)By... Apr 13 2005, 03:11 PM
Jeff7 Mention of a crewed orbiter around Venus brought u... Apr 10 2005, 02:43 PM
BruceMoomaw Me: "...the problem is that [landed humans] W... Apr 11 2005, 05:07 AM
Bill Harris Good post(s), Bruce. The critical problem we face... Apr 11 2005, 09:25 AM
Jeff7 QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Apr 11 2005, 04:25 AM)Go... Apr 11 2005, 02:54 PM
dvandorn QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Apr 11 2005, 04:25 AM)Ad... Apr 11 2005, 03:22 PM
Bill Harris QUOTE However, if we *do* intend to put humans on ... Apr 11 2005, 04:11 PM
Buck Galaxy So how long do we wait? Say MSL or some other rov... Apr 13 2005, 06:07 AM
Bill Harris QUOTE So how long do we wait? Say MSL or some othe... Apr 13 2005, 06:58 AM
paxdan QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Apr 13 2005, 07:58 AM)QU... Apr 13 2005, 07:46 AM
cIclops QUOTE (paxdan @ Apr 13 2005, 07:46 AM)<sni... Apr 13 2005, 08:30 AM
paxdan QUOTE (cIclops @ Apr 13 2005, 09:30 AM)QUOTE ... Apr 13 2005, 01:57 PM
Bill Harris QUOTE Well those millions of kilometres of vacuum ... Apr 13 2005, 12:42 PM
Gray Hmm, this topic seems to have split into two conve... Apr 13 2005, 01:21 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 12:44 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|