IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Voyager Panorama(s)
Tman
post Apr 7 2005, 03:27 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



Oppy's first navcam pics near Voyager, unfortunately he stood there fairly aslope.

Navcam Oppy Voyager sol424 (400KB)


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Tman
post Apr 7 2005, 07:17 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



Probably, suddenly I get appetite for Viking too smile.gif

In the meantime I've found a nice solution in order to flatten Voyager...

Navcam Oppy Voyager sol 424 (520KB)

This post has been edited by Tman: Apr 8 2005, 03:26 PM


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Apr 8 2005, 04:38 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (Tman @ Apr 7 2005, 01:17 PM)
Probably, suddenly I get appetite for Viking too smile.gif

In the meantime I've found a nice solution in order to flatten Voyager...

Navcam Oppy Voyager sol 424 (400KB)
*


Looks really good, Tman!

It's pretty obvious that both Viking and Voyager are a little smaller than Eagle -- I can't see the landing platform fitting inside either V or V with room for Oppy to roll off without driving halfway out.

Voyager is also obviously older than Viking. This is a really, really good example of how the ejecta blankets of craters of this size erode -- notice how here, around Voyager, the ejecta blocks are still visible around the crater, but they are efficiently flatted down. They still form a slight bit of relief (a small mound that the crater sits neatly amidst), but the blocks themselves have been worn down to a nearly flat surface. Note how nice and even Oppy's tracks are as they run through the ejecta blocks -- that's a flat surface.

Viking looked exactly like this *except* that the blocks around Viking are still partially intact.

This evaporite erodes down very, very efficiently, doesn't it? No matter what landforms were created within it, it seems to erode right down to flat fairly quickly... so it doesn't retain its structures above-ground all that well. The only thing it seems to retain is holes.

Makes you wonder what caused the cracks (i.e., Anatolia, etc.). Are they evaporation cracking of the surface, or are they erosional? Seeing how easy it is to erode these rocks, erosion might be a little more likely than I had thought.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 02:40 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.