IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Cassini Status, Cassini hardware & mission
cIclops
post Apr 9 2005, 08:20 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 29-January 05
Member No.: 161



Real problems or more negative journalism?

Cassini probe shows signs of wear


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
cIclops
post Apr 10 2005, 02:39 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 29-January 05
Member No.: 161



Here is a slightly different official view as given by the Cassini status report for April 6:

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/cassini/...ini-040605.html

Considering that Cassini hasn't finished the first year of its four year primary mission in Saturn orbit and with a quarter of its instruments not performing properly, it seems odd that Mitchell says: "Cassini has been working remarkably well considering the duration and complexity of the mission."


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jeff7
post Apr 10 2005, 02:54 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 477
Joined: 2-March 05
Member No.: 180



QUOTE (cIclops @ Apr 10 2005, 09:39 AM)
Here is a slightly different official view as given by the Cassini status report for April 6:

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/cassini/...ini-040605.html

Considering that Cassini hasn't finished the first year of its four year primary mission in Saturn orbit and with a quarter of its instruments not performing properly, it seems odd that Mitchell says: "Cassini has been working remarkably well considering the duration and complexity of the mission."
*


Well they have called Cassini the largest, most complicated probe ever sent to another planet. And they even sacrificed some of the extra features, like booms for the instruments - instead, they're fixed to the probe's main body.

7 years just to get there....quite a trip. And add a particularly active solar flare season to that.
I was a bit surprised though that they used the main antenna as a shield while going through the rings. It just didn't seem like a good thing to do - kind of useless to have a lot of data stored in a craft orbiting Saturn, unable to make the trip to Earth.
I just wonder if the antenna did a good enough job? The lens on the narrow angle camera has acquired a good bit of dust too.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Apr 11 2005, 03:40 PM
Post #4


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1374
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



"I was a bit surprised though that they used the main antenna as a shield while going through the rings."

I believe the main antenna was designed to act as a shield as well as an antenna.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 09:44 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.