My Assistant
Chemcam, Laser Induced Remote Sensing |
Apr 13 2005, 03:18 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 134 Joined: 13-March 05 Member No.: 191 |
Another interesting fact sheet on an MSL instrument. This one achieves remote sensing (up to 13 meters away) of elemental abundances by firing a laser and and performing spectrographic analysis of the resultant flash. Another part of the instrument is a Remote Micro Imager, which gives resolution approaching the MER MI, but at a range of 2 meters rather than 6 cm.
Apart from great opportunities for rapid science return, this instrument also has a significant coolness factor. Also: a new article on MSL and ChemCam from Astrobio.net. According to the article the Double and Delay option for MSL is still being considered. Anyone know when NASA will/must make a decision? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Apr 15 2005, 01:01 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 20 Joined: 27-December 04 Member No.: 131 |
>Double and Delay option
This is new information for me. I would realy welcome sending two rovers instead of one, that would be great improvement fot this mission. But if I shoul have decided, I would send one rover in 2009 and the second in 2011. Two reasons: - we would get some data sooner (who wants to wait by 2011?) - if the first rover fail, we would be able to improve/reconstruct the second rover to prevent another failure |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2005, 09:07 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 290 Joined: 26-March 04 From: Edam, The Netherlands Member No.: 65 |
QUOTE (arccos @ Apr 15 2005, 01:01 PM) >Double and Delay option This is new information for me. I would realy welcome sending two rovers instead of one, that would be great improvement fot this mission. But if I shoul have decided, I would send one rover in 2009 and the second in 2011. Two reasons: - we would get some data sooner (who wants to wait by 2011?) - if the first rover fail, we would be able to improve/reconstruct the second rover to prevent another failure The double and delay option is under consideration for months now. I'd say that a winning recepy should not be changed: if they build two: just send them within the same window in 2011. It takes time: let MRO do the cartography, carefully select the landingssites (which also needs further thorough analyses of MER data) and incorporate the fanciest and most sophisticated instruments possible at that time. The results will be worth waiting for.....besides: i want them to show us multiple succesfull (completely) autonomous skycrane landings in rocky terrain on earth, before they send these babies !! The testing of this landing technology is going to take a lot of time and attention. |
|
|
|
Redstone Chemcam Apr 13 2005, 03:18 PM
cIclops Thanks for the links. Very clever ideas. ChemCam w... Apr 13 2005, 03:52 PM
Redstone QUOTE (cIclops @ Apr 13 2005, 03:52 PM)Does t... Apr 13 2005, 04:10 PM
Gsnorgathon Does anyone else get a childish kick out of the no... Apr 14 2005, 01:16 AM
dvandorn QUOTE (Gsnorgathon @ Apr 13 2005, 08:16 PM)Do... Apr 14 2005, 06:48 AM
BruceMoomaw The artist's renderings of the MSL firing its ... Apr 14 2005, 06:20 AM
BruceMoomaw Correction: that other mineralogical instrument on... Apr 14 2005, 06:24 AM
Sunspot Remote Micro-Imager
The RMI will provide very high... Apr 14 2005, 06:23 PM
cIclops QUOTE (Sunspot @ Apr 14 2005, 06:23 PM)<cu... Apr 14 2005, 06:34 PM
odave QUOTE (Marcel @ Apr 21 2005, 05:07 AM).....be... Apr 21 2005, 03:00 PM
remcook a good article about MSL. makes me want the time t... Apr 21 2005, 08:35 AM
BruceMoomaw There's another good reason not to launch both... Apr 21 2005, 01:38 PM
Marcel QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Apr 21 2005, 01:38 PM)Th... Apr 21 2005, 01:56 PM
djellison I suppose one good reason to do one MSL, and anoth... Apr 21 2005, 02:06 PM
BruceMoomaw QUOTE (Marcel @ Apr 21 2005, 01:56 PM)To be h... Apr 21 2005, 03:22 PM
BruceMoomaw QUOTE (djellison @ Apr 21 2005, 02:06 PM)I st... Apr 21 2005, 03:27 PM
djellison Perhaps there's scope for something like ESA p... Apr 21 2005, 03:38 PM
BruceMoomaw There is certainly a lot of interest, after Cassin... Apr 21 2005, 05:29 PM
cIclops Collaborations work best when all partners gain so... Apr 22 2005, 07:57 AM
djellison QUOTE (cIclops @ Apr 22 2005, 07:57 AM)As ESA... Apr 22 2005, 09:16 AM
cIclops QUOTE (djellison @ Apr 22 2005, 09:16 AM)QUOT... Apr 22 2005, 03:51 PM
tedstryk QUOTE (cIclops @ Apr 22 2005, 03:51 PM)QUOTE ... Apr 22 2005, 04:31 PM
dvandorn QUOTE (cIclops @ Apr 22 2005, 10:51 AM)ESA ha... Apr 22 2005, 06:11 PM
cIclops QUOTE (dvandorn @ Apr 22 2005, 06:11 PM)QUOTE... Apr 23 2005, 11:24 AM
gpurcell QUOTE (cIclops @ Apr 23 2005, 11:24 AM)QUOTE ... Apr 25 2005, 07:59 PM
cIclops QUOTE (gpurcell @ Apr 25 2005, 07:59 PM)<c... Apr 25 2005, 09:14 PM
tedstryk QUOTE (cIclops @ Apr 25 2005, 09:14 PM)QUOTE ... Apr 25 2005, 09:35 PM
BruceMoomaw One more interesting little tidbit from the first ... Apr 25 2005, 10:41 PM
cIclops QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Apr 25 2005, 10:41 PM)On... Apr 26 2005, 06:47 AM
tedstryk Well, yes, ExoMars is one rover and one orbiter, b... Apr 26 2005, 09:49 AM
cIclops QUOTE (tedstryk @ Apr 26 2005, 09:49 AM)Well,... Apr 26 2005, 10:56 AM
Bob Shaw Comparisons between Beagle 2 and any putative ESA ... Apr 26 2005, 02:41 PM
djellison I think there were lessons learnt with B2 (no one ... Apr 26 2005, 02:50 PM
cIclops or how about a rover race on Mars ... Exo-Ferrari ... Apr 26 2005, 06:22 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 11:59 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|