IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

76 Pages V  « < 55 56 57 58 59 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
What's Up With Hayabusa? (fka Muses-c)
Toma B
post Nov 24 2005, 01:02 PM
Post #841


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 648
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Subotica
Member No.: 384



Oh my...
They have honored us with new update in english After 14 days!!!!

Thank you JAXA you are on good way to becoming as bad in "PR" as ESA... mad.gif mad.gif mad.gif mad.gif


--------------------
The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare

My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Nov 24 2005, 02:53 PM
Post #842


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10255
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



following up on the Bob and Ed exchange about Surveyor 3, I am posting an image in the historic images thread showing the footpad imprints.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Nov 24 2005, 02:58 PM
Post #843


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Nov 24 2005, 03:27 AM)
So, instead, the craft decided to abort by putting itself into "safe mode" and simply dropping to the surface (on its side) until it received that later ground command.
*

That phrase has convinced me the reason of not sampling dust since the Hayabusa was in "safe mode" that I didn't know about its consequences...

That is a good comment and it complements to my objections due to my lack good understanding about very complex problem that is caused from many factors that are out of control, missing of good engineering and software redundancies and testing. Now I see it much better.

I think this case has brought us a very good example since this case is a very unique and also as a good exercise to improve the design, plan and process for any future missions. cool.gif

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Nov 24 2005, 09:07 PM
Post #844


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (edstrick @ Nov 24 2005, 01:31 PM)
I have a complete audio tape of the landing of Surveyor 1 off TV, I've wanted to hear the landing commentary and communications loop for 3 ever since.
*


I watched Surveyor 1 land - the BBC did a 5am broadcast, in those days something very special - and I simply couldn't believe it when a fuzzy picture flashed up a few minutes later with 'Live from the Moon' written across it. Of course, it could have well been shot before the mission and sent out with the press kit, for all the detail you saw! Still, happy days...

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Nov 24 2005, 09:35 PM
Post #845


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



The JAXA Press Release says:

"From the data information that chemical engine repeated injection at constant frequency toward the specific direction for 30 minutes from 21:40 (WT), 6:40am (JST) to 22:10, 7:10am and measured distance by LRF was small enough and also the attitude was kept at steady angle, we know for sure that Hayabusa steadily maintained the attitude from the time of landing. As chemical engine was programmed to inject 15milli second per a second, when once landed, it could not overpower the gravity for taking off and changing attitude but jut kept injecting as long as allowed."

I read that as a fair amount of wasted RCS capability (a la NEAR on Eros), which may bode ill for a controlled return to Earth...

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Nov 25 2005, 02:29 AM
Post #846


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



New update from
Hayabusa will try again on the 26th

Next attempt to land would be around 7:00 am JSP (around 5:00 pm in New York Time) but the final GO ON would be around 00:00 am JSP (around 10:00 am in New York Time)
The press would be open at 11:00 am JSP (around 9:00 pm in New York Time)

1) The Itokawa temperature was between 60-70 degree centigrades.
2) The probe is ok in everything except LFR which is going to be tested soon.
3) The software had 7 to 8 traps during the 19th to 20th landing. They will change some parameters to ensure the continuity of the sequence for the second touch down.
4) JAXA/ISAS believes the probe has landed near the upper left corner of the target marker picture, in the Muses Sea. There were no big obstacles there, so they are speculating whether the obstacle sensor was accidentally triggered by unexpected amount of light coming back from the surface of Itokawa.
5) JAXA does not want to disclose the amount of propellent to newsman.

Much more good details, click the below URL where there an extensive interview done by several newsmans
http://5thstar.air-nifty.com/blog/2005/11/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Nov 25 2005, 02:35 AM
Post #847


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Nov 25 2005, 02:29 AM)
...7am (in probe time) on the 26th...

*

Ok someone help me out here. What time is that in a recognizeable time zone? PST would be nice, but I'll settle on any EARTH time zone that I can calculate from.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Nov 25 2005, 02:51 AM
Post #848


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Nov 24 2005, 09:35 PM)
Ok someone help me out here.  What time is that in a recognizeable time zone? PST would be nice, but I'll settle on any EARTH time zone that I can calculate from.
*

World Zone Times PST is 7 hours ahead than JSP (7:00 am JSP Nov 26 and 00:00 am in PST Nov 25)
World Present Time

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mike
post Nov 25 2005, 02:59 AM
Post #849


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 350
Joined: 20-June 04
From: Portland, Oregon, U.S.A.
Member No.: 86



JAXA didn't want to disclose the amount of remaining propellant? I suppose a little bit of suspense will make things that much more interesting..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Nov 25 2005, 03:31 AM
Post #850


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Nov 25 2005, 02:51 AM)
World Zone Times PST is 7 hours ahead than JSP (7:00 am JSP Nov 26 and 00:00 am in PST Nov 25)
World Present Time

Rodolfo
*

Thanks Rodolfo, but notice it said in "probe time". what does that mean? Who knows what time it is on an asteroid?


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
odave
post Nov 25 2005, 04:02 AM
Post #851


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 510
Joined: 17-March 05
From: Southeast Michigan
Member No.: 209



I noticed that the blogger at 5thstar saw my Star Wars humor image up-thread. I have been awarded the "Zabuton 5 Mai" prize for "a great gag". Thank you very much, 5thstar, I shall wear the badge with honor!

cool.gif


--------------------
--O'Dave
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
soramade
post Nov 25 2005, 04:33 AM
Post #852


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 23-November 05
Member No.: 567



MATSUURA L/D site:
The correction maneuver last night is confirmed all rigiht. Now Hayabusa is 5km far from Itokawa. The operation team is to try the second touchdown from 25th night to 26th morning JST.
Touchdown will occur at 7:00 26th JST , 22:00 25th UTC.

http://smatsu.air-nifty.com/lbyd/2005/11/2_8018.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
akuo
post Nov 25 2005, 02:19 PM
Post #853


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 24-March 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 63



Looks like the descent is starting again! Follow these sites:

Hayabusa Live
5th Star Blog


--------------------
Antti Kuosmanen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ishigame
post Nov 25 2005, 02:53 PM
Post #854


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 26
Joined: 25-November 05
From: Sydney
Member No.: 572



QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Nov 25 2005, 12:31 PM)
Thanks Rodolfo, but notice it said in "probe time".  what does that mean?  Who knows what time it is on an asteroid?
*

It takes 15-20 minutes in one way to communicate with the explorer.
There are 300 million km distance between Earth and Hayabusa.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rakhir
post Nov 25 2005, 03:20 PM
Post #855


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 370
Joined: 12-September 05
From: France
Member No.: 495



http://www.isas.jaxa.jp/home/hayabusa-live/

"An amulet for flight safety was put on the computer at the command room."

Attached Image


This attempt should be the good one. smile.gif

Rakhir
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

76 Pages V  « < 55 56 57 58 59 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 04:57 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.