My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
What's Up With Hayabusa? (fka Muses-c) |
Nov 25 2005, 10:43 PM
Post
#946
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 26 Joined: 25-November 05 From: Sydney Member No.: 572 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2005, 10:45 PM
Post
#947
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 25-November 05 From: Brussels, Belgium Member No.: 579 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2005, 10:47 PM
Post
#948
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Nov 25 2005, 10:43 PM) Well I can't take it much more. I'm going out to put up some Christmas decorations while I still have three hours of daylight. I'll check back now and then -------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2005, 10:48 PM
Post
#949
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 25-November 05 From: Tokyo JAPAN Member No.: 576 |
QUOTE (Ishigame @ Nov 26 2005, 07:43 AM) Yes Nobody will understand whether or not it touched knocked down, till the communication recoverd by the high gain antenna around at 11 AM JST |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2005, 10:48 PM
Post
#950
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13 Joined: 22-November 05 Member No.: 565 |
According to Matsuura's blog, we can only know around 11:00JST (TZ+9) if Hayabusa had succeeded in sample collection.
http://smatsu.air-nifty.com/lbyd/ It might have aborted at just a few meters away from the surface, only Hayabusa knows at the moment. One more good news: They still has one target marker left, they've led Hayabusa to land at the same place of the previous attempt. |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2005, 10:51 PM
Post
#951
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 370 Joined: 12-September 05 From: France Member No.: 495 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2005, 10:53 PM
Post
#952
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 25-November 05 From: Tokyo JAPAN Member No.: 576 |
and it meams....If propellant problem is excluded, the possibility once more of trying landing was guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2005, 10:54 PM
Post
#953
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 26 Joined: 25-November 05 From: Sydney Member No.: 572 |
According to Matuura's blog,
7:20 JST - Beacon stopped. 7:26 JST - Beacon restarted. 7:28 JST - JAXA updated official blog. |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2005, 10:54 PM
Post
#954
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
QUOTE (Kei-ichiro Sakurai @ Nov 26 2005, 09:48 AM) One more good news: They still has one target marker left, they've led Hayabusa to land at the same place of the previous attempt. But surely not enough fuel to use it and have another go? -------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2005, 10:56 PM
Post
#955
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 25-November 05 Member No.: 577 |
Infomatin from Matsuura's blog
This time , Hayabusa didinot use last one of target marker. If hayabusa have not to be able to get rock of itokawa. he can try again ! |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2005, 10:59 PM
Post
#956
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 25-November 05 From: Brussels, Belgium Member No.: 579 |
From smatsu's blog, here is my quick translation of his 7:38am entry:
""" The planned touch-down was to be around 7:10am JST (22:10 GMT) in probe time, on the ground it'd be around 7:26am JST (22:26 GMT). From the video footage streamed to the press room, there was a momentary interruption of the beacon signal at around 7:20JST, and at around 7:26JST the beacon signal started coming in again. Around 7:28JST, the ascent was announced. The blog reported it as "it started ascending for some reason". Whether it landed or not, we'll have to wait until the communication gets re-established around 11am JST via the high gain antenna. Judging from the timeline of the events, it seems natural that it did land and soared back up. However there is still a possibility that it aborted the landing and started its ascent at a few meters off the terrain. In any case, the staff members in the operation room look fairly calm. They are not *unhappy*. """ |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2005, 11:02 PM
Post
#957
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 25-November 05 From: Tokyo JAPAN Member No.: 576 |
also from Matsura blog
Professor MATOKAWA announced in press room" if the sample can take normally. In this case, Doppler displacement takes cleanly, but this time Doppler was disordered. |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2005, 11:03 PM
Post
#958
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 25-November 05 From: Tokyo JAPAN Member No.: 576 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2005, 11:05 PM
Post
#959
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13 Joined: 22-November 05 Member No.: 565 |
QUOTE (gonbe @ Nov 25 2005, 11:53 PM) and it meams....If propellant problem is excluded, the possibility once more of trying landing was guaranteed. Exactly.. Let's hope they still has enough, or some kind 'Itokawans' has a nice gas station. Oh there's another update.. we'll know some status around 8:10JST, they says. The doppler signal was disturbed at the moment of touchdown, which was not expected for a 'smooth' touchdown, Kawaguchi says. Matsuura also reports that Kawaguchi is willing even for an another trial (Hey they're working all night!). Seems like other staff needs some more Lipos? |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2005, 11:11 PM
Post
#960
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 25-November 05 Member No.: 577 |
from matsuura blog.
When a hayabusa began a rise, Mr kawaguchi the PM said "Let's do it once again" The very tired staff hit a big sigh. Only Mr.Kawaguchi does not seem to be tired still more. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 04:54 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|