IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Martian Sky, What's it look like?
nasaman58
post Apr 18 2005, 09:23 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 17-April 05
Member No.: 236



What I'm about to write could go equally well under the Opportunity section, but I had to put it somewhere. (Doug, maybe this ties to the post I wrote earlier in reply to your reorganization scheme about lumping oppy and spirit together).

Now, onto business...

I'm curious what the whole sky of Mars looks like. Whenever we get color pans, we only see a little strip of the sky (with the nice exception I believe Doug did of the sun above Eagle crater). Sure, the sky looks bright and maybe a tad bluish near the Sun, but what about up high near the zenith but away from the sun? Is it a dark brownish color? Or close to black?

On Sol 178 (July 4 for us Americans smile.gif )when Spirit was climbing toward West Spur, the PanCam was pointed up, so we got to see some darker, higher altitude sky than we normally see. But I'd like to see basically a whole-sky or near whole-sky "pan" to see the color gradients. Consider this a challenge for you people with the right Photoshop/software hook-ups and mad skillz!
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Bubbinski
post Apr 20 2005, 02:29 AM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 103
Joined: 12-February 05
From: Utah
Member No.: 167



QUOTE (Nirgal @ Apr 19 2005, 02:47 AM)
very well done !

also matches the impression of other pre-sunset views seen e.g. from the pathfinder mission.


*


Thanks, Nirgal. smile.gif

The pics by Spirit were taken one hour before sunrise....I assume the same blue halo around the sun would show then too, right? I'm wondering if maybe I used too much blue in my rendition to be realistic, but I like how it looks artistically, and it'll end up being my computer wallpaper.

In any case, using the Paint Shop Pro histogram function is merely adding a single, uniform color tone to an image. I'm a rank, and I do mean rank, amateur at image manipulation, a lot of the stuff I've seen on this board just blows my mind. For example, that Hazcam B&W image someone colorized was just awesome, I wish I had that kind of talent.


--------------------
- My signature idea machine is busted right now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
4th rock from th...
post Apr 21 2005, 05:59 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 378
Joined: 21-April 05
From: Portugal
Member No.: 347



QUOTE (Bubbinski @ Apr 20 2005, 03:29 AM)
QUOTE (Nirgal @ Apr 19 2005, 02:47 AM)


very well done !

also matches the impression of other pre-sunset views seen e.g. from the pathfinder mission.


*


Thanks, Nirgal. smile.gif

The pics by Spirit were taken one hour before sunrise....I assume the same blue halo around the sun would show then too, right? I'm wondering if maybe I used too much blue in my rendition to be realistic, but I like how it looks artistically, and it'll end up being my computer wallpaper.

In any case, using the Paint Shop Pro histogram function is merely adding a single, uniform color tone to an image. I'm a rank, and I do mean rank, amateur at image manipulation, a lot of the stuff I've seen on this board just blows my mind. For example, that Hazcam B&W image someone colorized was just awesome, I wish I had that kind of talent.
*




Hi,

On my page http://www.astrosurf.com/nunes/explor/explor_vik.htm you can see a sequence of sunrise images from Viking 1. I've calibrated so that the surface maintains the same basic color as in daylight if you brighten the images. On the original data blue levels are very high, but I think the human eye should compensate for that, as it does on earth. Overall brightness levels seem to be acurate.

So I think your colorization is very close to the original data, but if you were there the saturation whould appear lower.


--------------------
_______________________
www.astrosurf.com/nunes
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nirgal
post Apr 22 2005, 12:43 AM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 30-March 05
Member No.: 223



QUOTE (4th rock from the sun @ Apr 21 2005, 07:59 PM)
On my page http://www.astrosurf.com/nunes/explor/explor_vik.htm you can see a sequence of sunrise images from Viking 1. I've calibrated so that the surface maintains the same basic color as in daylight if you brighten the images. On the original data blue levels are very high, but I think the human eye should compensate for that, as it does on earth. Overall brightness levels seem to be acurate.


Hi forth_rock !

the color images on your site are absolutely awsome !
(Don Davis himself could not have made it better smile.gif

Also your MGS wide angle color composites...

What I especially like, is that your colors seem accurate *and*
very aesthetically pleasant at the same time.

Do you allow me to pose just two questions about your MGS images ?

The MGS Wide Angle camera has only two filters (red & blue) so
I suppose that you synthesize the green channel as a mixture of red&blue,
right ?

From the MGS/MSSS site raw images, do you use the "processed" i.e contrast stretched (GIf,IMG) versions or the unprocessed (IMQ) versions as
starting point for your RGB-color composites ?

BTW.: recently, there are also wunderful MGS color wide angles posted here
by djellison (lovely Olympus Mons & Limb pictures smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
4th rock from th...
post Apr 22 2005, 12:06 PM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 378
Joined: 21-April 05
From: Portugal
Member No.: 347



QUOTE (Nirgal @ Apr 22 2005, 01:43 AM)
QUOTE (4th rock from the sun @ Apr 21 2005, 07:59 PM)

On my page http://www.astrosurf.com/nunes/explor/explor_vik.htm you can see a sequence of sunrise images from Viking 1. I've calibrated so that the surface maintains the same basic color as in daylight if you brighten the images. On the original data blue levels are very high, but I think the human eye should compensate for that, as it does on earth. Overall brightness levels seem to be acurate.


Hi forth_rock !

the color images on your site are absolutely awsome !
(Don Davis himself could not have made it better smile.gif

Also your MGS wide angle color composites...

What I especially like, is that your colors seem accurate *and*
very aesthetically pleasant at the same time.

Do you allow me to pose just two questions about your MGS images ?

The MGS Wide Angle camera has only two filters (red & blue) so
I suppose that you synthesize the green channel as a mixture of red&blue,
right ?

From the MGS/MSSS site raw images, do you use the "processed" i.e contrast stretched (GIf,IMG) versions or the unprocessed (IMQ) versions as
starting point for your RGB-color composites ?

BTW.: recently, there are also wunderful MGS color wide angles posted here
by djellison (lovely Olympus Mons & Limb pictures smile.gif
*




Thankyou for your kind words.

For the MGS i used the Gif images, scaled the histograms using Mars Express and MER rover images as a guide for surface and sky colors and then created a green channel by mixing red and blue.
It isn't very accurate but the results are pleasing.

If you were in orbit the color might look different because of the atmosphere.
Light goes twice through the atmosphere on orbital images (sun - > down, reflected by the surface, up - > sensor).
By using surface images for reference I'm eliminating half of this effect, but i get more color variation and contrast. Otherwise it whould be "mars through red dust" type images.

Look at earth from space images and this effect is visible (lots of blue).

I'll put this explanations on my site some time in the future, as I did for the Viking stuff.

I like djellison images, great work there!

4throck


--------------------
_______________________
www.astrosurf.com/nunes
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 01:46 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.