My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
Tiny Craters |
Jun 27 2006, 07:58 AM
Post
#256
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 156 Joined: 18-March 05 From: Germany Member No.: 211 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 09:13 PM
Post
#257
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
I think we need to review and classify the range of features that have entered this discussion, in order to be sure we are all talking about the same things. Many of the features that have been discussed are quite different from the original mini-craters mentioned by JPL so long ago. In all honesty, they jumped the gun. The range of features is indeed large, and some look very much like sapping while others don't. I think the whole gamut of features could do with a really vigorous shaking to see what falls out, and even calling the things 'mini-craters' may be leading us all astray. Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 09:27 PM
Post
#258
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3009 Joined: 30-October 04 Member No.: 105 |
Cataloging the minicraters is one of my round-tuit projects. There is indeed a great deal of variability of these features; the only common link is a) they are cup-shaped and b ) they are not large.
--Bill -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jun 28 2006, 02:00 AM
Post
#259
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
It's 800 km/h not 800 km/sec. Otherwise we'd be talking about a cloud of iron plasma not an iron ball Whoops! Michael It is a bit of a judgement call, and now (with your prodding) that I've thought about it further than I did last night, I realize that a primary impactor of smaller mass could be expected to create the craters we've seen. Thanks for correcting me. -------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
|
Jun 28 2006, 09:45 AM
Post
#260
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Doug: I don't think so, no - or at least, not always. Impacts can result is some quite non-intuitive effects (for example, it's been suggested that on Earth it's possible that tektites 'surf' shock waves and end up with very non-linear distributions). And meteorites are often cold in their interiors - one with a nice ablative coating of ice should survive really well... Bob Shaw Following up your posts I found some interesting things by googling 'Icy meteorites'. Not only are they expected to survive passage through the Martian atmosphere quite well but they have been postulated to exist even here on Earth. Foeldi, Berczi and Lukacs proposed searching for ammonia-water meteorites on Antarctica in 1995. I don't think they found any! As far as I know the Tagish Lake meteorite remains our best example so far of a terrestrial meteorite containing ice. But it seems we have a plausible mechanism here for the formation of Martian craters, both small and large, new and old, from both primary and secondary impacts. If there was once an extensive frozen ocean on Mars we might expect to find a rash of impactor-less dimples formed by secondary ice projectiles in highland palaeosurfaces of appropriate age. |
|
|
|
| Guest_Bobby_* |
Sep 5 2007, 08:33 PM
Post
#261
|
|
Guests |
From Today's nav cam images. Looks like a mini crater has formed over one of the rovers tracks?
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...CUP1988L0M1.JPG |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2007, 08:58 PM
Post
#262
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 559 Joined: 1-May 06 From: Scotland (Ecosse, Escocia) Member No.: 759 |
From Today's nav cam images. Looks like a mini crater has formed over one of the rovers tracks? You mean the little feature apparently over-lapping the near track a few metres back? I think I see a discontinuity between the track alignment before and after this feature, and something similar at the corresponding point on the opposite wheel track, if you look carfeully. Seems to me like a little sideways "jiggle" in the Rover's motion. Kenny |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2007, 09:21 PM
Post
#263
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 559 Joined: 1-May 06 From: Scotland (Ecosse, Escocia) Member No.: 759 |
Bobby
This Navcam mosaic from Tesheiner in "Back to Work" thread shows a better view of one of the discontinuities I mention above, at the right end of the trail. Tesheiner pan |
|
|
|
Sep 8 2007, 05:45 AM
Post
#264
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
Hehe, there was a recent pancam image showing one of these elusive mini-craters in the process of formation.
-------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 02:19 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|