My Assistant
Looking For The Landers |
| Guest_Sunspot_* |
May 1 2005, 06:19 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mro/spotlight/20050412.html
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter will follow clues to where the lost Mars Polar Lander and Beagle 2 might be. |
|
|
|
![]() |
May 4 2005, 03:13 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
HiRise is a BEAST
20,000 pixels across, and images typically 40,000 pixels tall The centre 4000 pixels is in both Red and Blue Each pixel will be about 30cm on a side projected onto the ground - giving a typical image size of 6km x 12km To scan a full image wont take that long - but relaying back to earth at around 1.5Mbps will take about 15-20 minutes Doug |
|
|
|
May 5 2005, 06:03 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
QUOTE (djellison @ May 4 2005, 10:13 AM) HiRise is a BEAST 20,000 pixels across, and images typically 40,000 pixels tall The centre 4000 pixels is in both Red and Blue Each pixel will be about 30cm on a side projected onto the ground - giving a typical image size of 6km x 12km To scan a full image wont take that long - but relaying back to earth at around 1.5Mbps will take about 15-20 minutes Doug OK -- 30cm resolution (on average) is awesome -- that's about a one-foot resolution for those of us who don't yet think in metric, right? How does this compare to the single-axis (push-direction) resolution of cPROTO MOC images? Since the cPROTO images have been able to resolve the MERs and the MER landers (even suggesting shape), I'd have to think that they are giving at least 50-60cm resolution, at least in one axis. IIRC, the best Apollo pancam images of the Moon had about 2m to 3m resolution, and that was deliberately softened from the absolute capabilities of the system because DOD imposed restrictions on how good they would let ITEK make the cameras for NASA (since NASA was basically asking to use the same camera system that was flying on DOD's KH surveillance satellites at the time). This leads to the question -- is 30cm resolution *really* the best achievable, or does DOD still refuse to allow NASA to use the *real* highest-resolution imaging systems that have been developed? And will just asking that question impose the risk of me just disappearing somewhere into the night...? -the othe -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
Sunspot Looking For The Landers May 1 2005, 06:19 PM
edstrick They will want to image all known landing sites in... May 2 2005, 09:17 AM
djellison Things that we should be able to find...
Viking 1... May 2 2005, 11:37 AM
Sunspot http://space.com/missionlaunches/050502_mpl_search... May 2 2005, 11:59 AM
remcook what is the footprint size of HiRise? how long doe... May 4 2005, 02:27 PM
tedstryk "The Mars 3 descent module was mounted on the... May 4 2005, 03:02 PM
John M. Dollan Out of curiosity...
How far do you suppose the ch... May 5 2005, 06:45 AM
djellison MOC can do 1.5m/pixel - but the downrange sampling... May 5 2005, 07:57 AM
dvandorn QUOTE (djellison @ May 5 2005, 02:57 AM)MOC c... May 5 2005, 08:19 AM
djellison I cant imagine a data-pipeline that would work fro... May 5 2005, 09:05 AM
edstrick Lunar orbiter 2 and 3 were capable of 1 meter reso... May 5 2005, 11:04 AM
tedstryk QUOTE (edstrick @ May 5 2005, 11:04 AM)Lunar ... May 5 2005, 12:39 PM

dvandorn QUOTE (tedstryk @ May 5 2005, 07:39 AM)I want... May 5 2005, 03:08 PM
dvandorn QUOTE (edstrick @ May 5 2005, 06:04 AM)Lunar ... May 5 2005, 03:47 PM
chris QUOTE (dvandorn @ May 5 2005, 03:47 PM)I don... May 5 2005, 04:09 PM
dvandorn QUOTE (chris @ May 5 2005, 11:09 AM)QUOTE (dv... May 5 2005, 04:29 PM
tty QUOTE (dvandorn @ May 5 2005, 06:29 PM)QUOTE ... May 5 2005, 06:05 PM
djellison http://marsoweb.nas.nasa.gov/HiRISE/instrument.htm... May 5 2005, 12:40 PM
edstrick I do not clearly recall whether the man who intent... May 6 2005, 10:08 AM
jaredGalen "In a statement newly issued on the MSSS Mars... May 6 2005, 01:42 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 02:45 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|