IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Looking For The Landers
Guest_Sunspot_*
post May 1 2005, 06:19 PM
Post #1





Guests






http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mro/spotlight/20050412.html

Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter will follow clues to where the lost Mars Polar Lander and Beagle 2 might be.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
djellison
post May 4 2005, 03:13 PM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



HiRise is a BEAST smile.gif

20,000 pixels across, and images typically 40,000 pixels tall

The centre 4000 pixels is in both Red and Blue

Each pixel will be about 30cm on a side projected onto the ground - giving a typical image size of 6km x 12km

To scan a full image wont take that long - but relaying back to earth at around 1.5Mbps will take about 15-20 minutes

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post May 5 2005, 06:03 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (djellison @ May 4 2005, 10:13 AM)
HiRise is a BEAST smile.gif

20,000 pixels across, and images typically 40,000 pixels tall

The centre 4000 pixels is in both Red and Blue

Each pixel will be about 30cm on a side projected onto the ground - giving a typical image size of 6km x 12km

To scan a full image wont take that long - but relaying back to earth at around 1.5Mbps will take about 15-20 minutes

Doug
*


OK -- 30cm resolution (on average) is awesome -- that's about a one-foot resolution for those of us who don't yet think in metric, right? smile.gif

How does this compare to the single-axis (push-direction) resolution of cPROTO MOC images? Since the cPROTO images have been able to resolve the MERs and the MER landers (even suggesting shape), I'd have to think that they are giving at least 50-60cm resolution, at least in one axis.

IIRC, the best Apollo pancam images of the Moon had about 2m to 3m resolution, and that was deliberately softened from the absolute capabilities of the system because DOD imposed restrictions on how good they would let ITEK make the cameras for NASA (since NASA was basically asking to use the same camera system that was flying on DOD's KH surveillance satellites at the time).

This leads to the question -- is 30cm resolution *really* the best achievable, or does DOD still refuse to allow NASA to use the *real* highest-resolution imaging systems that have been developed?

And will just asking that question impose the risk of me just disappearing somewhere into the night...?

-the othe


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Sunspot   Looking For The Landers   May 1 2005, 06:19 PM
- - edstrick   They will want to image all known landing sites in...   May 2 2005, 09:17 AM
- - djellison   Things that we should be able to find... Viking 1...   May 2 2005, 11:37 AM
- - Sunspot   http://space.com/missionlaunches/050502_mpl_search...   May 2 2005, 11:59 AM
- - remcook   what is the footprint size of HiRise? how long doe...   May 4 2005, 02:27 PM
|- - tedstryk   "The Mars 3 descent module was mounted on the...   May 4 2005, 03:02 PM
- - djellison   HiRise is a BEAST 20,000 pixels across, and imag...   May 4 2005, 03:13 PM
|- - dvandorn   QUOTE (djellison @ May 4 2005, 10:13 AM)HiRis...   May 5 2005, 06:03 AM
- - John M. Dollan   Out of curiosity... How far do you suppose the ch...   May 5 2005, 06:45 AM
- - djellison   MOC can do 1.5m/pixel - but the downrange sampling...   May 5 2005, 07:57 AM
|- - dvandorn   QUOTE (djellison @ May 5 2005, 02:57 AM)MOC c...   May 5 2005, 08:19 AM
- - djellison   I cant imagine a data-pipeline that would work fro...   May 5 2005, 09:05 AM
- - edstrick   Lunar orbiter 2 and 3 were capable of 1 meter reso...   May 5 2005, 11:04 AM
|- - tedstryk   QUOTE (edstrick @ May 5 2005, 11:04 AM)Lunar ...   May 5 2005, 12:39 PM
||- - dvandorn   QUOTE (tedstryk @ May 5 2005, 07:39 AM)I want...   May 5 2005, 03:08 PM
|- - dvandorn   QUOTE (edstrick @ May 5 2005, 06:04 AM)Lunar ...   May 5 2005, 03:47 PM
|- - chris   QUOTE (dvandorn @ May 5 2005, 03:47 PM)I don...   May 5 2005, 04:09 PM
|- - dvandorn   QUOTE (chris @ May 5 2005, 11:09 AM)QUOTE (dv...   May 5 2005, 04:29 PM
|- - tty   QUOTE (dvandorn @ May 5 2005, 06:29 PM)QUOTE ...   May 5 2005, 06:05 PM
- - djellison   http://marsoweb.nas.nasa.gov/HiRISE/instrument.htm...   May 5 2005, 12:40 PM
- - edstrick   I do not clearly recall whether the man who intent...   May 6 2005, 10:08 AM
- - jaredGalen   "In a statement newly issued on the MSSS Mars...   May 6 2005, 01:42 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 02:45 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.