My Assistant
News About Beagle 2 |
| Guest_Sunspot_* |
Mar 8 2004, 01:53 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
The Atmosphere at high altitude may have been to thin to slow Bealge 2 enough during the entry, article here:
"The Beagle 2 lander could have crashed into Mars because the atmosphere on the planet was less dense than expected. UK mission scientists told a London meeting the probe may simply have been going too fast for its parachute and airbags to bring about a soft landing. " http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3543295.stm |
|
|
|
![]() |
Mar 8 2004, 03:13 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
This ties in with the suggestion that Beagle 2's slightly pointier heatshield ( 60 degrees instead of 70 degrees of the rovers and pathfinder ) - would cause the altitude at which the parachute would deploy to be too low.
It was scarey enough with the Rovers, deploying a mile too low They took the design for B2s heatshield from Huygens - but of course, Hugyens is enterting the MUCH thicker Titan atmosphere ( 1.5 x earth - so approx 150 times mars) The heatshield design itself was ok -it just had to low a Cd Suggestions of pictures of bits of lander on the ground from MOC - if they show them at the public thing tonight - I'll be posting them tomorrow Doug |
|
|
|
Sunspot News About Beagle 2 Mar 8 2004, 01:53 PM
DavidVicari QUOTE The meeting was also told that an unidentifi... Mar 8 2004, 03:21 PM
djellison Isnt that like, err, Mars?
There were a whole seq... Mar 8 2004, 03:25 PM
DavidVicari When I first saw the picture, I thought it might o... Mar 8 2004, 03:51 PM
djellison Well - quite a good evening, not a presentation as... Mar 8 2004, 11:33 PM
MizarKey Doug, thanks for posting the link to the video of ... Mar 10 2004, 10:56 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 05:46 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|