IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Mars Polar Lander Found? - Pictures
Sunspot
post May 5 2005, 10:19 PM
Post #1


Rover Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2164
Joined: 9-February 04
Member No.: 17



http://skyandtelescope.com/news/article_1509_1.asp

In December 1999 NASA's Mars Polar Lander (MPL) was supposed to touch down near the red planet's south pole. But shortly after it entered the Martian atmosphere, the spacecraft disappeared without a trace. Only now, 5½ years later, do scientists think they may have finally located the lander's wreckage and confirmed what went wrong with the mission. The full report, by planetary scientist Michael C. Malin (Malin Space Science Systems), appears in the July 2005 issue of Sky & Telescope, now in press.

More from MSSS:

http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2005/05/05/index.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
John M. Dollan
post May 6 2005, 02:20 AM
Post #2


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 21
Joined: 31-January 05
From: Havre, MT
Member No.: 163



The news story on this at spaceref.com stated that the candidate white dot would indicate that the lander reached the surface "relatively intact" after a 40 meter drop. I wonder what the definition of "relatively" would be in this case? Obviously enough damage would have been done to disable, at the least, the communications ability.

...John...


--------------------
"To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe..."
-- Carl Sagan
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th September 2010 - 02:42 AM
IYA Logo

Unmannedspaceflight.com supports the IAU's International Year of Astronomy in the USA, the UK and around the world

|

The running costs of Unmannedspaceflight.com are provided by donations from visitors and members. Please use the PayPal button to contribute
 
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or its operators