IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Sol480 Sunset
dilo
post May 11 2005, 05:52 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



cool.gif




--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Start new topic
Replies (30 - 44)
Deeman
post Jun 6 2005, 05:28 PM
Post #31


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 59
Joined: 13-February 05
From: Germany - NRW
Member No.: 168



QUOTE (dilo @ Jun 5 2005, 08:27 PM)
Interesting results, Deeman!
The sky color matching between different images is very good and the dark foreground terrain details are well visible by reducing contrast and increasing luminosity: a result clearly better than mine!  rolleyes.gif I notice also that your overall sky hue is a little bit yellower than mine, a color probably more realistic.
However, I cannot explain the bright halo around the Sun, some kind of asymmetric "flou" effect...  huh.gif
*



Yep, did a little lens flare too ! Couldn`t resist rolleyes.gif
And i did the asymmetric to the effect to give the whole a more realistic look. hopefully unsure.gif

Greets, Dirk
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tman
post Jun 6 2005, 06:31 PM
Post #32


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



Hi Dirk, I coudn't resist too. rolleyes.gif
At which yours seems to be more realistic, since there is more dust in the air on Mars - like on Earth when sun go down as a red ball.

Apropos, how about red sun ball when Mars sunset?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tman
post Jun 10 2005, 08:04 PM
Post #33


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



I'm still waiting for all full resolution pics from this sunset. They must still be over there in Spirit's memory!?

Should we send an E-mail with our sunsets to Steve or someone else, including a request for the good stuff? smile.gif Someone who can write it in perfect English (it isn't rather me rolleyes.gif ).


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jun 10 2005, 08:26 PM
Post #34


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Its more than likely that they just took down-sampled images anyway.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tman
post Jun 10 2005, 09:16 PM
Post #35


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



Isn't it that Pancam takes automatically full res. pics when recording? Or has that to do how far they command to read out the 1024x1024 CCDs for storage? So not read out all pixel?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dot.dk
post Jun 10 2005, 09:30 PM
Post #36


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 578
Joined: 5-November 04
From: Denmark
Member No.: 107



http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA07997

smile.gif cool.gif


--------------------
"I want to make as many people as possible feel like they are part of this adventure. We are going to give everybody a sense of what exploring the surface of another world is really like"
- Steven Squyres
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
slinted
post Jun 10 2005, 09:42 PM
Post #37


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 468
Joined: 11-February 04
From: USA
Member No.: 21



Subframing or downsampling is part of the command they send when the picture is taken, so I think it is only recorded on the rover as subframe or downsampled, the original full res image isn't stored. I can't think of a time when we saw a subframe or downsample image that was replaced later by a full frame version of itself. I could be wrong about this...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jun 10 2005, 09:44 PM
Post #38


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (Tman @ Jun 10 2005, 09:16 PM)
Isn't it that Pancam takes automatically full res. pics when recording? Or has that to do how far they command to read out the 1024x1024 CCDs for storage? So not read out all pixel?
*


They will always 'take' 1024 x 1024, but they can read out a 2x2 binned or 4x4 binned image - or downsize or a sub-sample after the image was taken smile.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tman
post Jun 10 2005, 10:36 PM
Post #39


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



So I hope I'm not too illegal cool.gif

http://www.greuti.ch/spirit/sol489_JPLsunset.jpg

(Sorry, but I'm hooked about it)


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
edstrick
post Jun 11 2005, 12:49 AM
Post #40


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



Running a bandpass filter enhancement on the TIF version of the sunset pic <from the planetary photojournal website>, I get a psychadelic version that shows abundant, though very low contrast rippled haze, superimposed on random noise and digitization contours from the camera's data (original, or the 8-bit/channel tif)

Systematic color fringing of the haze patterns in the upper half of the frame (red on top, blue on bottom) indicates the direction of movement of the haze between image shutterings.

Most of the twilight images I've looked at have similar ultra-low contrast haze structure, different every time.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Jun 11 2005, 03:51 AM
Post #41


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (edstrick @ Jun 11 2005, 12:49 AM)
Running a bandpass filter enhancement on the TIF version of the sunset pic <from the planetary photojournal website>, I get a psychadelic version
*

Good job Picasso, but please don't cut off your ear just yet..


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jun 11 2005, 04:16 AM
Post #42


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10265
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Just saw Edstrick's Mars sunset image. Wow, that takes me back... several decades.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
edstrick
post Jun 11 2005, 07:05 AM
Post #43


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



(grins at Phil....)
GREEN ROCKS!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Jun 11 2005, 09:44 AM
Post #44


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jun 10 2005, 11:16 PM)
Just saw Edstrick's Mars sunset image.  Wow, that takes me back... several decades.
*

Like, wow, man...

Seriously, Ed's photomanipulation, while almost psychedelic in appearance, does contain some very interesting information. Anything that brings out such low-contrast features and shows movement with time is a valuable tool -- even if it looks like you had to take acid to figure it out... biggrin.gif

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mike
post Jun 11 2005, 07:41 PM
Post #45


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 350
Joined: 20-June 04
From: Portland, Oregon, U.S.A.
Member No.: 86



Yeah, because nobody's ever figured out anything meaningful while on acid... wink wink
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 12:31 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.