ilbasso
Dec 12 2006, 09:36 PM
Now that we're coming through another Martian winter at Gusev, anyone want to wager a Mars Bar on what sol we will be seeing our first dust devil this season?
climber
Dec 12 2006, 09:45 PM
QUOTE (ilbasso @ Dec 12 2006, 10:36 PM)
Now that we're coming through another Martian winter at Gusev, anyone want to wager a Mars Bar on what sol we will be seeing our first dust devil this season?
May be we have to set up a panel
AlexBlackwell
Dec 12 2006, 10:01 PM
Speaking of dust devils at Gusev, Greeley
et al. just had a
paper on the subject published in
JGR-Planets. Figure 2 of the paper is a cool image (2N181053592EFFAEOTP0607L0M1) that I'd never noticed before, though I'm sure the resident Pancam hounds saw it.
Stu
Dec 12 2006, 10:09 PM
jamescanvin
Dec 13 2006, 12:00 AM
Great another pool.
So the first DD was seen on sol 421, add one M-year gets us to 1089/1090.
Now on one hand DD's are going to be much harder to see this year, we can't see much of the plains and being back at 'plain level' they will not have the ground as a backdrop making them harder to see. On the other hand though, the team knows when to start looking and at what time of day this year.
Hmm, difficult, I think I'm going to go with 1094.
JAmes
climber
Dec 13 2006, 07:18 AM
1054, the year of the Crab Nebulae formation.
Would be nice to have a picture of one from MRO.
I know that MGS capture some but MRO's will be something.
Tesheiner
Dec 13 2006, 07:38 AM
Mmm, as you said James, Spirit is not located at the best location for DD hunting so I will place my bet about one (earth) month later.
Sol 1120.
slinted
Dec 13 2006, 09:36 AM
Latitudinal dependency in dust devil activity on Mars had an interesting analysis of Gusev dust devils. Inside the search box which included Gusev, Whelley and Greeley found dust devils tracks all year, although there was a substantial increase during what we know to be the 'season'. I also think a good case could be made that the El Dorado streaks are from dust devils, although spotting one in the act could be a challenge.
That being said, I'm going to put my optimistic bet down for sol 1065, in the hope that the new dust devil detection software is used soon. I think the first one will be imaged not long after they begin looking.
climber
Dec 13 2006, 12:01 PM
Can't remember the approx. time of the Sol the DD start. We need some heating for sure.
The meaning of my question is because we need Spirit to be awake to catch one and I'm not sure she'll have enough power in one month from now.
ustrax
Dec 13 2006, 12:22 PM
QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Dec 13 2006, 07:38 AM)
Mmm, as you said James, Spirit is not located at the best location for DD hunting so I will place my bet about one (earth) month later.
Sol 1120.
Minus one:
1119
Rakhir
Dec 13 2006, 01:40 PM
1100 for me.
ngunn
Dec 13 2006, 02:04 PM
QUOTE (climber @ Dec 13 2006, 07:18 AM)
Would be nice to have a picture of one from MRO.
I know that MGS capture some but MRO's will be something.
Just a thought: I wonder if HiRISE could be programmed to take many repeat images of a smaller area instead of one big image? Could dust devil movies be constructed this way?
Pertinax
Dec 13 2006, 02:08 PM
Hmm,
That is a good question -- our viewing location is worse, but our detection ability is better.... again, hmmmm....
let's say sol 1111 for fun.
-- Pertinax
CosmicRocker
Dec 13 2006, 03:00 PM
I definitely have to side with the optimistic minority this time, and guess sol 1070. I think the team's experience plus the new software will outweigh any disadvantage the viewing angle might present. Of course, my optimism depends on them using the new software very soon.
IIRC, during most of the last DD season we didn't have a good view into the inner basin. However, quite a number of plains DDs were observed heading in that general direction. We are largely surrounded by hills here, so being down near the plain level is probably not as much of a disadvantage here, as it would be out on the plains.
Marz
Dec 13 2006, 03:52 PM
I'm betting on a late season sighting of Sol 1177
alan
Dec 13 2006, 06:16 PM
Spirit need to move out of this low spot first. A couple of weeks after she returns to homplate: sol 1082
fredk
Dec 14 2006, 12:40 AM
I vote for a Christmas present dd, let's say sol 1060.
dvandorn
Dec 14 2006, 03:46 AM
I'll go for Sol 1066 -- and will be looking carefully for any Normans who may be storming up behind it...
-the other Doug
edstrick
Dec 14 2006, 09:56 AM
Let's not be too... Hastings ... about it.
Shaka
Dec 14 2006, 06:31 PM
Somewhere out there, Ed, Bob Shaw is smiling proudly.
edstrick
Dec 15 2006, 10:59 AM
Of course, it could be Storming Norman, but black-head stormed up another gulf.
alan
Dec 16 2006, 04:49 PM
QUOTE (slinted @ Dec 13 2006, 03:36 AM)
[That being said, I'm going to put my optimistic bet down for sol 1065, in the hope that the new dust devil detection software is used soon. I think the first one will be imaged not long after they begin looking.
Is tosol soon enough?
CODE
01050 p1561.04 0 0 0 0 0 0 navcam_fast_DustDevil_SF_LEYE_lvlaz_295
ustrax
Dec 16 2006, 06:28 PM
QUOTE (alan @ Dec 16 2006, 04:49 PM)
Is tosol soon enough?
CODE
01050 p1561.04 0 0 0 0 0 0 navcam_fast_DustDevil_SF_LEYE_lvlaz_295
Just deliver it to us! Deliver it!
CosmicRocker
Dec 17 2006, 06:18 AM
That is excellent news. We optimists really needed that software to run soon, or we'd be dead in the water, or perhaps the dust. So, how do we read that code (navcam_fast_DustDevil_SF_LEYE_lvlaz_295)? It seems that the navcam left eye will be searching toward an azimuth of 295 (or -65, in +/- from North). I think this should be its approximate view, though I am sure they will aim the camera somewhat higher than I have.
Click to view attachmentDoes anyone have any guesses as to what the other descriptors mean...fast, SF, and lvl?
fredk
Dec 17 2006, 06:35 AM
SF = subframe
fast may be some parameter for the auto dd search.
CosmicRocker
Dec 17 2006, 07:38 AM
Oh darn. SubFrame...duh! I guess that was so obvious that I totally missed it. Regarding "fast," that was my best guess, too.
slinted
Dec 17 2006, 02:30 PM
QUOTE (alan @ Dec 16 2006, 08:49 AM)
Is tosol soon enough?
Fine by me
The images
are down, but it doesn't look like they captured anything.
I think the 'fast' part refers to a type of movie (same command sequence number even) used back on sols 684 through 715 (the last time a dd movie was attempted). I'm not sure we are seeing the new detection software being used yet, at least not in this particular sequence.
QUOTE
p1561 Fast Dust Devil Movies may take up to 10 mins (conservative estimate) –
Maki/Geissler consulted to take out shutter subtraction from the sequence to reduce the
conservative time estimate to 3.5 mins. This sequence has not been tested – we really don’t
know how long it will take or what the dark current will be. But if it runs long, the first thing to
lose will be the 2nd movie at the end of the block.
from the
Sol 682 SOWG Documentarian report
CosmicRocker
Dec 24 2006, 05:30 AM
QUOTE (slinted @ Dec 17 2006, 08:30 AM)
... The images
are down, but it doesn't look like they captured anything.
I think the 'fast' part refers to a type of movie (same command sequence number even) used back on sols 684 through 715 (the last time a dd movie was attempted). I'm not sure we are seeing the new detection software being used yet, at least not in this particular sequence. ...
Apparently they did not run the "DD detection part of the program, as you suggested.
QUOTE
The 12/22/2006 Spirit update says: On the rover's 1052nd Martian day, or sol, of exploring Mars (Dec. 18, 2006), Spirit ran part of the dust devil watch, acquiring six images during the process, but did not run the dust-devil detection part of the program. Rover handlers planned to rerun the test on sol 1058 (Dec. 24, 2006).
Since they say they will "rerun" the test on sol 1058, I assume that means that the DDD part of the program will again not be run. I guess we will not get an early Christmas present.
Bob Shaw
Dec 24 2006, 11:14 PM
I bid ten Quatlos for Feb 1st.
Bob Shaw
nprev
Dec 24 2006, 11:46 PM
Mmmm...twenty quatloos on 23 Jan....
alan
Dec 25 2006, 12:01 AM
QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Dec 24 2006, 05:14 PM)
I bid ten Quatlos for Feb 1st.
Bob Shaw
Hey, look who showed up for Christmas
Welcome back.
Bob Shaw
Dec 25 2006, 12:30 AM
QUOTE (alan @ Dec 25 2006, 12:01 AM)
Hey, look who showed up for Christmas
Welcome back.
No, either late for the Solstice or early for Hogswatch Night (the 33rd of December).
Good to be back, though...
Bob Shaw
climber
Dec 25 2006, 08:52 PM
helvick
Dec 28 2006, 06:50 PM
QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Dec 25 2006, 12:30 AM)
Good to be back, though...
Great to see you back Bob ! Did you finally slay the NTL dragon or just move to a different provider?
Bob Shaw
Dec 28 2006, 07:29 PM
QUOTE (helvick @ Dec 28 2006, 06:50 PM)
Great to see you back Bob ! Did you finally slay the NTL dragon or just move to a different provider?
NTL must have fixed whatever bit of DNS thuggery was doing me in! I claim no responsibility - they just did it...
Bob Shaw
edstrick
Dec 29 2006, 12:36 PM
Given their beneficial effect on Rover power levels and survivability....
Shouldn't we call them DUST ANGELS?
helvick
Dec 29 2006, 04:23 PM
I think not - see
Phil Plaits BA entry on someone who shares this opinion. I thnk I'll stick with Dust Devils for now.
SteveM
Dec 29 2006, 08:31 PM
QUOTE (helvick @ Dec 29 2006, 11:23 AM)
I think not - see
Phil Plaits BA entry on someone who shares this opinion. I thnk I'll stick with Dust Devils for now.
Sorry to continue this Off Topic thread but in my real life I read medieval texts, including biblical commentaries, and compared to them this stuff is really odd. In the Middle Ages the commentators were conscious when they were were being allegorical and when they were making a literal interpretation.
This guy seems to take his allegories literally.
Decidedly wierd.
Steve
ilbasso
Jan 2 2007, 07:07 PM
^^^ Gee, just seeing faces in the rocks on Mars seems pretty tame by comparison, doesn't it?! Of course, they probably are the hideous grimaces of the damned frozen forever in the rock of Satan's wrath.
ustrax
Jan 3 2007, 12:38 PM
Ant103
Jan 3 2007, 01:55 PM
O_o
It's clearly visible on these two images of the FHC :
Sol 1041Sol 1062Observe the sky brightness and the shadows...
Sunspot
Jan 10 2007, 10:34 AM
The shadows look very dark again in this latest haz cam image:
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/spirit/fo...CGP1131R0M1.JPGAs for dust devils, perhaps this years dust devil season will be like last years Atlantic Hurricane season.
slinted
Jan 16 2007, 09:04 PM
There's a short update on
Mark Lemmon's page :
QUOTE
New, sol 1076: Tau has fallen and we approach the time of year we saw dust devils last year. We have experimented with the WATCH command (autonomous detection) and will be very interested in testing it to confirm it works with the parameters we use when there is a dust devil. Then, I expect, we'll use it alot. Or at least I'll ask for it...
Mizar
Jan 23 2007, 07:52 PM
If you look at dilo's animation in this thread :
http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...3199&st=105Then you'll see that the first dust devil has already been recorded.
Just look at the upper right in this animation.
fredk
Jan 23 2007, 08:01 PM
Good eye, Mizar! I was just staring at the obvious foreground thing. So it looks like the software caught first the real devil in 3 frames, then was fooled in the last 2 frames by the foreground reflection if that's what it is.
According to
James, tosol's sighting (1086) is only a few sols before the 1 Martian year aniversary of the first dd spotted.
Pertinax
Jan 23 2007, 08:43 PM
Ditto, good eyes.
I was coming over to note the gust / dust devil found after posting finally in the 'Changes' thread only to see that Mizar had noted the same.
I doubt little will beat climatology in any forecasting contests on mars!
-- Pertinax
Mizar
Jan 23 2007, 08:54 PM
Thanks fredk and Pertinax.
Let's hope they grow, ready to do some cleaning tasks to poor dusty Spirit.
jamescanvin
Jan 23 2007, 09:48 PM
Looks like nprev wins the pool.
QUOTE (nprev @ Dec 25 2006, 10:46 AM)
Mmmm...twenty quatloos on 23 Jan....
Floyd
Feb 9 2007, 02:35 PM
New Dust Devil on spirit
pancam Edit: Too excited about DD to know my pancam from my navcam--but I linked to the correct image.
djellison
Feb 9 2007, 02:58 PM
cough navcam ahem.
Cool DD though
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.