QUOTE (NGC3314 @ Mar 23 2008, 10:00 PM)

This brings up a curious point - spectacles, not to mention things like glass beads, had been around for a long time, so why did it take so long for telescopes to appear? I find it hard to believe that either Galilean or Keplerian forms hadn't been hit upon numerous times before Lipperhey; it didn't take Galileo long to replicate and improve his products from, as far as I can tell, secondhand reports.
The chances of just anybody accidentally stumbling across the right arrangement of lenses for long-distance magnification isn't that high. First you need to have a lot of different lenses on hand; second, you need to be playing around with them in ways that are quite outside the normal range of activities for a 16th-century optician. If the general arrangement (two lenses, of two different kinds, held in line at some distance from each other) is known, then a little experimentation with different kinds of lenses could quickly yield the desired result. But if it's *not* known, under what circumstances would one accidentally discover it?
The earliest telescopes, IIRC, had a magnification of something like 3x (or less) and were little more than toys, though they still possessed enough utility to get people interested. Galileo had the scientific/engineering mindset that allowed him to devise experiments which would not only duplicate, but improve on the instrument. That mindset was very much a rarity at the beginning of the 17th century.