Tried running them through my pipeline but it blew up during the ISIS3 cam2map step with the error "**PROGRAMMER ERROR** Angle cannot be a non-Null special pixel." First time I've seen that...
mcaplinger
Apr 19 2021, 11:19 PM
Just to warn everybody -- owing to various DSN factors, it may be a while before the rest of PJ33 shows up.
Beautiful! I want to get at that storm in PJ33-27 & 28 sooo bad! Did you have any spice errors or other issues with this perijove, or is it just me?
Brian Swift
Apr 20 2021, 06:08 PM
QUOTE (Kevin Gill @ Apr 20 2021, 09:06 AM)
Beautiful! I want to get at that storm in PJ33-27 & 28 sooo bad! Did you have any spice errors or other issues with this perijove, or is it just me?
I didn't notice any spice problems on my side. The special pixel is just wants to torment you.
fredk
Apr 21 2021, 06:24 PM
QUOTE (Brian Swift @ Apr 20 2021, 05:40 PM)
While we're waiting... Here's my processing of what has been downlinked
Thanks a lot, Brian - these mosaics make great summaries of the encounters.
Kevin Gill
Apr 22 2021, 06:22 PM
QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Apr 19 2021, 06:19 PM)
Just to warn everybody -- owing to various DSN factors, it may be a while before the rest of PJ33 shows up.
Mike, I was wondering if you could check the image times and spacecraft clock values reported in the image metadata. My processing doesn't work (camera can't find Jupiter) if I use the values as reported, but if I shift them to ~10 hours earlier, it's closer. I'm not sure of the exact time difference or if the error is in the metadata JSON or in the spice kernels.
Thanks!
Turns out to be an issue with the spice kernels that are off by the ~10 hours. Imagery times appear to be correct.
mcaplinger
Apr 22 2021, 08:43 PM
QUOTE (Kevin Gill @ Apr 22 2021, 10:22 AM)
Mike, I was wondering if you could check the image times and spacecraft clock values reported in the image metadata.
Image 16 is SCLK 671800194:54 or 2021 APR 15 23:03:54.55 and the JSON on missionjuno says "IMAGE_TIME": "2021-04-15T23:03:54.546" so that all seems right to me.
We used juno_sc_rec_210414_210416_v01.bc and spk_ref_210111_251021_210111.bsp to do our processing, I believe, and it certainly found Jupiter OK.
mcaplinger
Apr 23 2021, 01:11 AM
QUOTE (Kevin Gill @ Apr 22 2021, 10:22 AM)
Turns out to be an issue with the spice kernels that are off by the ~10 hours.
Be aware that some of the files on the NAIF website produced before the EM was official will have the old pre-EM orbit, which I expect was the source of your problems. But I'm not sure which are good and which are bad or how this interacts with the ISIS kernel updating process, if that's what you're using.
Bjorn Jonsson
Apr 23 2021, 03:13 AM
To prepare for the extended mission and maintain the orbit, PJ33 was delayed by exactly one jovian day compared to earlier plans. See https://britastro.org/node/25896
Brian Swift
Apr 23 2021, 05:21 AM
QUOTE (fredk @ Apr 21 2021, 11:24 AM)
Thanks a lot, Brian - these mosaics make great summaries of the encounters.
Thanks Fred. And the large versions on Mission Juno allow you to explore the full resolution of all the color images in a perijove.
volcanopele
Apr 23 2021, 06:04 AM
I don't do a lot of JunoCAM processing, but for Juno visualizations, I maintain a metakernel that I try to update about once a week. I use the following kernels for the spacecraft position:
The first is the reference orbit for the extended mission while the other two are regularly updated files covering the predicted orbit through July 20 (at present) and the recorded orbit (through March 21). The latter two files are regularly updated and I just keep those files up-to-date.
mcaplinger
Apr 23 2021, 06:27 AM
QUOTE (volcanopele @ Apr 22 2021, 10:04 PM)
spk_ref_210111_251021_210111.bsp... is the reference orbit for the extended mission...
One problem is that this file (which we also use, see above) isn't on the NAIF web site at present, we've asked that it be put back up. The older ref files are, I think, wrong (as one would expect.)
Using the rec or later pre files should be safe, I hope.
mcaplinger
Apr 23 2021, 08:54 PM
I think all of the PJ33 images are on missionjuno now.
No plumes apparent, though Chalybes would be on the bright limb at upper left. Chalybes had been cooling down in late 2019/early 2020 so it may not have an active plume at present. No known plume sources on the terminator, so the lack of a plume is not entirely surprising...
I will leave it to others to tease out and process the grouping of three Galilean moons in that image. Europa is the smaller half-moon to the left of Io and Callisto is even smaller, and darker, between the two and maybe a half a framelet down.
Brian Swift
Apr 24 2021, 06:59 AM
QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Apr 23 2021, 01:54 PM)
I think all of the PJ33 images are on missionjuno now.
No Departure Movie?
Kevin Gill
Apr 24 2021, 08:39 PM
So, per suggestion from Candy Hansen, I switched to using the predicted kernel. And as she predicted, it worked!
Departure movie and lightning search up now. Not sure when they were posted.
volcanopele
May 25 2021, 07:50 PM
QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Apr 22 2021, 11:27 PM)
One problem is that this file (which we also use, see above) isn't on the NAIF web site at present, we've asked that it be put back up. The older ref files are, I think, wrong (as one would expect.)
The reference kernel spk_ref_210111_251021_210111.bsp is back on the NAIF site.
Bjorn Jonsson
Jun 6 2021, 09:50 PM
A map-projected mosaic of images pj33_48 and 49, approximately true color/contrast and enhanced versions: