IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

17 Pages V  « < 14 15 16 17 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Landing Site Imagery
jmknapp
post Jun 27 2008, 05:28 PM
Post #226


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (ahecht @ Jun 26 2008, 04:54 PM) *
I think Percival Lowell did.


Although Lowell thought he saw "man"-made canals. As for seeing evidence of water channels generally on this very dry world, Lowell has plenty of modern company. In fact, the word "water" almost seems to inhabit every other sentence in the history of Mars scientific inquiry and ruminations, relative lack of said substance notwithstanding.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jun 27 2008, 05:56 PM
Post #227


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (Airbag @ Jun 26 2008, 02:23 PM) *
[Edit: Titles have now been added to the sol 30 page, and this one is from a sequence called "1378-8: SSI Solstice Image", so no coincidence! This shadow is thus the shortest noon one.]

Except that this image was taken at almost 7pm...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Jun 27 2008, 06:24 PM
Post #228


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jun 27 2008, 06:28 PM) *
Although Lowell thought he saw "man"-made canals. As for seeing evidence of water channels generally on this very dry world, Lowell has plenty of modern company. In fact, the word "water" almost seems to inhabit every other sentence in the history of Mars scientific inquiry and ruminations, relative lack of said substance notwithstanding.


There are billions of tonnes of water on Mars. It's mostly frozen though..........
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Airbag
post Jun 27 2008, 06:43 PM
Post #229


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 408
Joined: 3-August 05
Member No.: 453



QUOTE (fredk @ Jun 27 2008, 01:56 PM) *
Except that this image was taken at almost 7pm...


I sit entirely corrected; the azimuth of 110 degrees is also a giveaway that this image was taken looking almost due East, i.e. it is an early evening shot. So, this is the shortest shadow for around 7pm smile.gif

Next time I will be more careful...

Airbag
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ahecht
post Jun 27 2008, 07:37 PM
Post #230


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 40
Joined: 27-May 08
Member No.: 4145



QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jun 27 2008, 12:28 PM) *
Although Lowell thought he saw "man"-made canals. As for seeing evidence of water channels generally on this very dry world, Lowell has plenty of modern company. In fact, the word "water" almost seems to inhabit every other sentence in the history of Mars scientific inquiry and ruminations, relative lack of said substance notwithstanding.


The point I was trying to make is that the human brain is very good at connecting the dots, especially in low contrast images, and see lines where there are none.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dburt
post Jun 27 2008, 09:33 PM
Post #231


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 384
Joined: 4-January 07
Member No.: 1555



QUOTE (ahecht @ Jun 27 2008, 12:37 PM) *
The point I was trying to make is that the human brain is very good at connecting the dots, especially in low contrast images, and see lines where there are none.

Absolutely right. Especially given that in Lowell's time, it was generally assumed that the Moon and other planets (especially Mars, given its telescopically visible polar ice cap and seasons) had intelligent beings living on them. Even when I grew up, about 75 years later, it was still assumed that Venus was a habitable jungle world. In a very real sense, then, Lowell was just seeing what he assumed he might see. At the time, few had reason to doubt his vision.

-- HDP Don
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scalbers
post Jun 27 2008, 10:52 PM
Post #232


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1629
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 184



QUOTE (Airbag @ Jun 26 2008, 03:23 PM) *
Deliberate "self portrait" shadow shot or just coincidence? A simplistic color composite based on Phoenix SSI raw images, sol 030:

[attachment=14835]

[Edit: Titles have now been added to the sol 30 page, and this one is from a sequence called "1378-8: SSI Solstice Image", so no coincidence! This shadow is thus the shortest noon one.]


Looks like a bit of "opposition effect" here, and would be interesting to examine this at the highest possible solar elevation.

Steve

P.S. I'm unsure how to show the attachment in my quote, but you can see it in post #219.


--------------------
Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
3488
post Jul 1 2008, 12:40 PM
Post #233


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 47
Joined: 27-June 08
From: Ashford, Kent, United Kingdom.
Member No.: 4244



Hello everyone, I'm a newbie again (felt scared off last time). I have been lurking for some considerable time since my first registration. Now I feel, that I can contribute in a more meaningful manner.

A couple of images from Phoenix below & some confirmation & to share a thought / idea.

If my maths is correct, Phoenix lies approx 1,303 KM / 809 miles away from the North Pole?

Below, I had a go at working on the central portion of the colour pan looking north. I have cropped out the section from Azm 350 deg, to 10 degrees, therefore due north is dead centre.

There are three low rises visible on the horizon? Pingos perhaps? Any thoughts.
Attached Image


Below is the view centred on Azm 151.58 degrees, showing two large boulders. The nearer one, I wonder, could that be examined in high resolution through all filters on the SSI & that data be matched by HiRISE of Heimdall Crater, to see if that boulder is a match? I suspect the one right on the horizon is too far away? That large boulder to the north of the backshell is very interesting. I could not find it on the HiRISE image of the landing site of Phoenix & components.

My guess is that this boulder would have been large enough to have been seen, or is it deceptive, smaller & closer to Phoenix than I'm imagining?
Attached Image


Also I thought this knarled up piece of rock looked very interesting. I have cropped & enlarged it.
Attached Image


Does anyone know if any Midnight Sun observations are going to be made? Perhaps a time lapse movie of the Sun swooping low over the northern horizon? Also this would be a good time for Azm 90 & 270 degree views & for glows / high cloud studies/ Martian Parhelia. Any thoughts?

Hopefully I will be feeling more confident once I've been back a while.

{Edited: Added some text}.

Andrew Brown.


--------------------
"I suddenly noticed an anomaly to the left of Io, just off the rim of that world. It was extremely large with respect to the overall size of Io and crescent shaped. It seemed unbelievable that something that big had not been visible before". Linda Morabito on discovering that the Jupiter moon Io was volcanically active. Friday 9th March 1979.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 1 2008, 03:51 PM
Post #234


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (3488 @ Jul 1 2008, 12:40 PM) *
The nearer one, I wonder, could that be examined in high resolution through all filters on the SSI & that data be matched by HiRISE of Heimdall Crater, to see if that boulder is a match?

I assume you mean the one I've arrowed in the inset:

Attached Image

I think I've identified it on the hirise view (arrow). The azimuth looks right (a bit "left" of the backshell) and the distance too (comparable distance to the heatshield). Obviously its colour is a close match to the surroundings, but you can see a shadow in the hirise shot which looks right.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glennwsmith
post Jul 1 2008, 05:30 PM
Post #235


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 21-April 05
Member No.: 328



Andrew, interesting image that, looking due north . . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
3488
post Jul 1 2008, 06:27 PM
Post #236


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 47
Joined: 27-June 08
From: Ashford, Kent, United Kingdom.
Member No.: 4244



QUOTE (fredk @ Jul 1 2008, 04:51 PM) *
I assume you mean the one I've arrowed in the inset:

Attached Image

I think I've identified it on the hirise view (arrow). The azimuth looks right (a bit "left" of the backshell) and the distance too (comparable distance to the heatshield). Obviously its colour is a close match to the surroundings, but you can see a shadow in the hirise shot which looks right.


Thank you so very much, that's it. The positioning on the HiRISE image is perfect, 151.5 degrees Azm from Phoenix. That is definitely it. I really hope that the boulder will be a target of interest, when the SSI is used to cherry pick interesting features.

Below, near the WNW horizon, I think I may have spotted a small impact crater, at the bottom of this frame, I've cropped & enlarged. I know, it's rubbish compared to the professionals here on UMSF, but I thought this would be of interest. Also blocks & boulders on the hills?
Attached Image


QUOTE (glennwsmith @ Jul 1 2008, 06:30 PM) *
Andrew, interesting image that, looking due north . . .


Thank You. Yes I like that image very much. It is a crop from the colour swathe released a while back, but I altered the contrast & brightness a little bit & the result is what you see. Carry on straight up the middle, & eventually you will come to the pole.

The image I cropped it from is below. Also the due north point is in the very centre.
Attached Image


Andrew Brown.


--------------------
"I suddenly noticed an anomaly to the left of Io, just off the rim of that world. It was extremely large with respect to the overall size of Io and crescent shaped. It seemed unbelievable that something that big had not been visible before". Linda Morabito on discovering that the Jupiter moon Io was volcanically active. Friday 9th March 1979.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
imipak
post Jul 1 2008, 07:14 PM
Post #237


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 646
Joined: 23-December 05
From: Forest of Dean
Member No.: 617



( Edit - remove foolish attempt at stretching the wrong bit of Andrew's image... !!)

It looks suggestive to me, but I haven't the time or especially the skills to search in that direction for candidate features on an orbital view.

PS No need to feel intimidated, we don't bite! I, at least, have a lot less skill with imagery than you've already demonstrated smile.gif

EDIT: ...and to prove it, I completely misinterpreted your post and did an excited stetch of the horizon, convinced I could see a typical crater... rolleyes.gif


--------------------
--
Viva software libre!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glennwsmith
post Jul 2 2008, 02:51 AM
Post #238


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 21-April 05
Member No.: 328



This is a big part of what I like about UMSF -- the international aspect. "Carry on straight up the middle, and eventually you will come to the pole" -- the essence of British matter of fact mode. Of course, we will never be able to top the romance language mystique of the "Ultreya Abyss"!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jul 15 2008, 09:23 PM
Post #239


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



I need some help. The HiRISE team has released a new image of the Phoenix landing site, taken on June 16 (sol 21). The dynamic range in this image is big enough that detail in the parachute is lost to saturation in the version that I can view with IAS viewer, and I'm traveling and not on a connection reliable enough to download any of the big images. Is there someone out here who can get me a segment of the RED image maybe in a 16-bit format that preserves the detail in the parachute?

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Jul 16 2008, 11:06 AM
Post #240


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Jul 15 2008, 05:23 PM) *
Is there someone out here who can get me a segment of the RED image maybe in a 16-bit format that preserves the detail in the parachute?


I looked at the JP2 images--not sure if the following have more detail than the largest wallpaper on the HIRISE site, but they're different anyway:







Those are just JPG crops, with a little processing--not sure how to get a 16-bit format.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

17 Pages V  « < 14 15 16 17 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 09:07 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.