IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

LCROSS Lunar Impact
nprev
post Oct 9 2009, 02:19 AM
Post #1


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



T minus 9 hrs. 10 min till impact. NASA TV coverage begins @ 1015 GMT (0315 PDT). Link to coverage here.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
17 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 99)
Astro0
post Oct 9 2009, 03:06 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



Separation image (inset) and interpretation (using Celestia add-on).
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Oct 9 2009, 03:11 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1431
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



You've had much better luck with simulating it in Celestia with that add-on than I. In Celestia, I had the moon behind the Centaur as seen from LCROSS, and there doesn't seem to be the moon in the live feed.


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shaka
post Oct 9 2009, 03:19 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1229
Joined: 24-December 05
From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones.
Member No.: 618



smile.gif O.K. Bend over please.
This may sting a little.


--------------------
My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Oct 9 2009, 04:15 AM
Post #5


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



(Ouch!!!!!!) tongue.gif

Astro0, what's the FOV of that Celestia view? Reason I ask is that the Moon wasn't visible in the post-separation raw images as far as I could see; just curious. (Great composition, BTW, as per your usual!)

(EDIT: I see that Hungry already mentioned that.)


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Oct 9 2009, 05:51 AM
Post #6


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Humph.

Stupid Moon.

Have to go to work, so I'll miss the whole thing.

(scuffs toes on ground)

Not fair.

mad.gif


Have fun everyone! Looking forward to hearing all about it when I get back.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Oct 9 2009, 06:26 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



nprev... I've got no idea of the FOV for that image...I just thought it looked nice and helped orient me to the 'real' image...not even sure if it's right! Remember me cool.gif I'm the 'artist' not the scientist laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Oct 9 2009, 07:12 AM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1431
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



QUOTE (nprev @ Oct 8 2009, 11:15 PM) *
...Reason I ask is that the Moon wasn't visible in the post-separation raw images as far as I could see; just curious.


Is this the terminator of the moon in the lower-left corner of the IR image? If so, it may suggest either a very narrow FOV, or simply that the moon is quite off-centre from the image.

http://www.nasa.gov/externalflash/lcross-c...separation2.jpg


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Oct 9 2009, 07:16 AM
Post #9


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



Here's the moon as I see it now, ignorant mode here, where's the impact site in this photo? tongue.gif


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Oct 9 2009, 07:22 AM
Post #10


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1431
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



Haha, it's the very southern point in that image. I don't suspect your image is detailed enough to resolve Cabeus crater.


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Oct 9 2009, 07:25 AM
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (ustrax @ Oct 9 2009, 12:16 AM) *
Here's the moon as I see it now, ignorant mode here, where's the impact site in this photo? tongue.gif


It's at the left tip of the lighted side in that image Rui/


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Oct 9 2009, 08:43 AM
Post #12


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



Thanks guys! smile.gif


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Oct 9 2009, 08:53 AM
Post #13


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1276
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



Tee Hee laugh.gif

Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Oct 9 2009, 09:34 AM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1276
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



Every time I see the impact story on the news, the media tends to over play the impact.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Oct 9 2009, 09:38 AM
Post #15





Guests






I can already see that. Bombing the Moon, that's it. Fortunately or not, we're living in a sci-fi shaped world. And there are people who are afraid of the impact. But there's no danger. Impacts occur very often.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Oct 9 2009, 10:04 AM
Post #16


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



Good morning all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Oct 9 2009, 10:14 AM
Post #17





Guests






Broadcast starts in a minute:

http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Oct 9 2009, 10:22 AM
Post #18


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



Can't watch video at work sad.gif. I'll make do with JSC stills.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Oct 9 2009, 10:25 AM
Post #19





Guests






I usually take snapshots, but I'm also at work and don't have the graphics programs. I'll try however to do the best I can from here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Oct 9 2009, 10:26 AM
Post #20


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10166
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Recent Twitter post:

SSC_Final_ME_sph = 310.52235358536 E -84.7311739853509
about 1 hour ago from web
LCROSS Centaur and SSC target coordinates (Lat., Lon. in ME): Centaur_Final_ME_sph = 311.302088477883 E -84.6743872273512
about 1 hour ago from web

I see they are targeting an individual molecule...

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Oct 9 2009, 10:30 AM
Post #21


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



If that's a water molecule is that such a bad thing?


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Oct 9 2009, 10:37 AM
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1431
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



The target molecule will probably be destroyed. Perhaps they're hoping to detect the water molecules adjacent to that one? tongue.gif


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Oct 9 2009, 10:45 AM
Post #23





Guests






Moon!

Don't know if it was the Moon imaged by the previous flyby or a live downlink. Too noisy here.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Oct 9 2009, 10:48 AM
Post #24





Guests






All instruments are operating nominally, that's great news, great chance of getting data!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AndyG
post Oct 9 2009, 10:49 AM
Post #25


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 593
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 279



Live - and getting bigger! smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Oct 9 2009, 10:50 AM
Post #26


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (Zvezdichko @ Oct 9 2009, 05:45 AM) *
Don't know if it was the Moon imaged by the previous flyby or a live downlink. Too noisy here.

Sounded live to me. the scientist being interviewed was quite emotional when asked his feeling at the time it was shown. He said he was feeling [many] emotions at the same time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deefatman
post Oct 9 2009, 10:50 AM
Post #27


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 23-June 09
Member No.: 4835



I didn't realise Hubble was going to be observing things!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Oct 9 2009, 10:54 AM
Post #28





Guests






Yes, this is the Moon seen by LCROSS in real time!

Yet another screenshot coming. Unfortunately I won't be able to combine them all - no graphics programs here.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Oct 9 2009, 11:00 AM
Post #29


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Which crater is Cabeus in that screenshot?


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Oct 9 2009, 11:00 AM
Post #30





Guests








Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Oct 9 2009, 11:09 AM
Post #31


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Oct 9 2009, 06:00 AM) *
Which crater is Cabeus in that screenshot?

Asked if they can pick out the target, the scientists said it's still too far away for them to pick it out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deefatman
post Oct 9 2009, 11:10 AM
Post #32


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 23-June 09
Member No.: 4835



It really reminds you how big the moon is when you consider how long left there is and that the moon is already filling up the entire frame, we always consider the moon small next to earth but in it's own right it's still enormous.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Oct 9 2009, 11:11 AM
Post #33


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Can anybody spot Cabeus in the LCROSS view? Having trouble getting oriented this morning, even with coffee rolleyes.gif


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Oct 9 2009, 11:12 AM
Post #34





Guests






Live view from the IR camera!
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Oct 9 2009, 11:13 AM
Post #35


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



YAWN .... I am tired! Going to watch on the large screen TV. I'll check back here in a while.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Oct 9 2009, 11:15 AM
Post #36


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Okay, nevermind, here is what I could put together:

Attached Image


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Oct 9 2009, 11:16 AM
Post #37


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



In the current view on screen now, Cabeus is just below and to the left of center


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Oct 9 2009, 11:17 AM
Post #38


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



'Mornin' everyone. Just got the NASA feed working on my computer; @#$% cable company here STILL don't carry NASA TV.

(The marine layer has torpedoed plans to set up my scope!)


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Oct 9 2009, 11:18 AM
Post #39


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



try this link !

http://www.mmto.org/lcross/

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Oct 9 2009, 11:18 AM
Post #40


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



(Are we supposed to eat peanuts now?)


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Oct 9 2009, 11:19 AM
Post #41





Guests






Visible...



And IR image...


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Oct 9 2009, 11:22 AM
Post #42


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (nprev @ Oct 9 2009, 04:17 AM) *
'Mornin' everyone. Just got the NASA feed working on my computer; @#$% cable company here STILL don't carry NASA TV.

(The marine layer has torpedoed plans to set up my scope!)

Be careful. Even if NASA TV doesn't show up on your digital cable box lineup, NASA TV may still be available over clearQAM by plugging the coax directly into your TV. That's the case here in Tucson with Cox Cable. In Tucson, it's on channel 72-4.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mchan
post Oct 9 2009, 11:27 AM
Post #43


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 599
Joined: 26-August 05
Member No.: 476



Bit humorous there when they went thru the station checks and concluded with "go for impact". It's not like they can scrub...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deglr6328
post Oct 9 2009, 11:29 AM
Post #44


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 356
Joined: 12-March 05
Member No.: 190



(Are we supposed to eat peanuts now?)


NO! Eating peanuts during a crash (even when deliberate) confuses the flying spaghetti monster and then he won't be able to be relied upon to guide our future soft landing missions down safely with his noodly appendage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Oct 9 2009, 11:29 AM
Post #45


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



The image is growing visibly frame by frame. This is so cool....


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Oct 9 2009, 11:29 AM
Post #46


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Thanks for the link, MahFL! Slooh was rained and clouded out at both locations.

Cloudy here...


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Oct 9 2009, 11:29 AM
Post #47





Guests








Latest snapshot
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AndyG
post Oct 9 2009, 11:31 AM
Post #48


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 593
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 279



And poor Stu is missing it!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Oct 9 2009, 11:32 AM
Post #49


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Impact flash! Woot!

EDIT: err. maybe not... that's just a surface feature...


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deglr6328
post Oct 9 2009, 11:39 AM
Post #50


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 356
Joined: 12-March 05
Member No.: 190



ehhhhhh, did I miss it? I didn't see a thing on the video.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Oct 9 2009, 11:40 AM
Post #51





Guests









This is probably the thermal confirmation, I think
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deefatman
post Oct 9 2009, 11:40 AM
Post #52


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 23-June 09
Member No.: 4835



I didn't see anything either
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Oct 9 2009, 11:40 AM
Post #53


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



I didn't see anything...
but the R/T lithobraking was cool!

Dim flash suggests soil impact rather than rocks...good news!


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Oct 9 2009, 11:41 AM
Post #54


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1431
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



I never saw an impact flash (at least one that I recognized as such).
Is what we saw the best quality LCROSS images?


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Oct 9 2009, 11:42 AM
Post #55


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



I saw NOTHING !!!!, thats my story and I am sticking to it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Oct 9 2009, 11:42 AM
Post #56


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



NASA TV showing the IR now. There's a hotspot, all right.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Oct 9 2009, 11:44 AM
Post #57


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



I'm going back to bed. You kids woke me up for this?


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Oct 9 2009, 11:44 AM
Post #58





Guests








Is this the hot spot anyway?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deglr6328
post Oct 9 2009, 11:46 AM
Post #59


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 356
Joined: 12-March 05
Member No.: 190



I think that's just a sunlit crater rim nprev. Zvez, that mid-IR image is just mostly noise from excessively high gain after the last sunlit hotspots went out of frame.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Oct 9 2009, 11:46 AM
Post #60


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (Zvezdichko @ Oct 9 2009, 06:44 AM) *
Is this the hot spot anyway?

Looks like the hot, sunlit peak of a crater rim.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tanjent
post Oct 9 2009, 11:47 AM
Post #61


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 214
Joined: 30-December 05
Member No.: 628



One of the commentators identified that hotspot as sunshine hitting the crater rim. I thought it looked like an impact site myself - perhaps there is some confusion about that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ToSeek
post Oct 9 2009, 11:49 AM
Post #62


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 128
Joined: 5-May 04
Member No.: 74



QUOTE (Decepticon @ Oct 9 2009, 04:34 AM) *
Every time I see the impact story on the news, the media tends to over play the impact.


Yeah, the CNN caption was "NASA Attacks the Moon."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Elias
post Oct 9 2009, 11:49 AM
Post #63


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 30-May 05
Member No.: 396



QUOTE (tanjent @ Oct 9 2009, 01:47 PM) *
One of the commentators identified that hotspot as sunshine hitting the crater rim. I thought it looked like an impact site myself - perhaps there is some confusion about that.


That hotspot was visible before the impact - I think its just the crater rim
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NGC3314
post Oct 9 2009, 11:54 AM
Post #64


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 87
Joined: 9-November 07
Member No.: 3958



Some of us were doing an image sequence with a 0.9m telescope in Arizona, with the moon nearly at zenith. Nothing obvious in Cabaeus as we watched the data come in. I'm turning around now to try aligning and differencing the image to see whether we can tease out a more subtle plume signature.

Edit 40 minutes later - difference imaging shows no plume detection within limits from telescope shake and seeing (which can be improved but not in real time). That makes sense if the SSC only saw a subtle signature.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stewjack
post Oct 9 2009, 11:56 AM
Post #65


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 252
Joined: 5-May 05
From: Mississippi (USA)
Member No.: 379



10 a.m. - LCROSS Post-Impact News Conference - AMES (Public and Media Channels)

10 AM Eastern Time
7 AM Pacific
14:00 GMT/UTC I think

Jack
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc
post Oct 9 2009, 11:57 AM
Post #66


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 276
Joined: 11-December 07
From: Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Member No.: 3978



I too failed to see anything. You should have heard my brother, 'Well, where is it?' mad.gif


--------------------
We talk of nothing but Curiosity here
Follow me on twitter or Google +
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deglr6328
post Oct 9 2009, 11:59 AM
Post #67


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 356
Joined: 12-March 05
Member No.: 190



oh well, that was anticlimactic. As it's going to be hours at least before other images are released and with the news channels in full mediagasm mode over the prez' Nobel, I really don't expect any data until next week. g'nite!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Oct 9 2009, 12:04 PM
Post #68


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



I'm already dreading the headlines: "NASA Moon Bomb A Dud", etc. ad nauseum. Sure hope the science was a success; have to find out after work. G'night/G'morning everyone.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Oct 9 2009, 12:15 PM
Post #69





Guests






I'm very sorry you felt disappointed. I can understand why - no bright flash. But the real treasure could be coming to us.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Oct 9 2009, 12:18 PM
Post #70


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1431
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



QUOTE (Zvezdichko @ Oct 9 2009, 07:15 AM) *
But the real treasure could be coming to us.

That's my stance too. We haven't seen or heard from LRO or HST.


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mchan
post Oct 9 2009, 12:24 PM
Post #71


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 599
Joined: 26-August 05
Member No.: 476



from discussion on nasaspaceflight forum --

http://www.gargaro.com/MaRvInWaVs/boom.wav
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Oct 9 2009, 12:25 PM
Post #72


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1431
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



I recall hearing that science return aside, they would be quickly able to determine if the mission was a success or not. While I have very little doubt that LCROSS will return data, has there been any word from the LCROSS team itself?


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Oct 9 2009, 12:29 PM
Post #73


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



From LCROSS shortly after Centaur impact...
Attached Image


Last frame from LCROSS video before it cutout...
Attached Image


....I think that the whole sequence was fantastic. cool.gif
Watching the Moon's surface rush towards us reminded me of the old footage of Ranger heading for impact.
The anticipation/tension of the whole thing was great.
Was anyone else leaning closer to their screen hoping to see something?...ANYTHING!

There's going to be more data here than we can see right now.
Let's wait for the press conference being held in about 90 minutes.

In a way, I'm glad there was no 'flash'....that might convince some media/public that it wasn't a bomb! wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Oct 9 2009, 12:34 PM
Post #74


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1431
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



Oh definitely, absence of the Centaur impact aside, I definitely enjoyed it. I, too, leaned closer =)


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Oct 9 2009, 12:35 PM
Post #75


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



laugh.gif !, mchan!

Oh, I'm not disappointed personally, and of course the real gold will be in the properly acquired & calibrated data. In all likelihood the popular media's gonna be a bit snarky, though, and that's always not the best for NASA.

I was thinking that this would be a good trick to try on one of Mercury's poles someday, with the caveat that the chase spacecraft would have to do a grazing flyby--not an impact-- & survive at least long enough to play back the observations.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Oct 9 2009, 12:39 PM
Post #76


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



I would say it's a safe bet if water is found in a shadowed crater, it's a common thing that could be found in ALL solar systems.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Oct 9 2009, 12:40 PM
Post #77


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



For anyone interested, there is an archived version of NASA TV's coverage here.

It's 109mb, I'm downloading it now and will try to put together an edited version of the last few minutes before and after Centaur and LCROSS impact.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Oct 9 2009, 12:41 PM
Post #78


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1431
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



NASA news conference at 10 AM EDT
They've got some 'splaining to do. laugh.gif


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Oct 9 2009, 12:51 PM
Post #79


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



Maybe they impacted a lunar bog ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Oct 9 2009, 12:53 PM
Post #80


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1431
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



Quote David Morrison, Director of NASA's Lunar Science Institute"I think we're all a little bit disappointed that we didn't see anything, but 90% of the data has not yet been seen."
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1795...-into-moon.html


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Oct 9 2009, 01:00 PM
Post #81


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2921
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



May be it was a splash, not a kaboum: this has to be liquid water


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Oct 9 2009, 01:09 PM
Post #82


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10166
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



http://www.mmto.org/lcross/

Go here for streamimg video from MMT possibly showing the impact plume. But Palomar reportedly saw nothing.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Oct 9 2009, 01:25 PM
Post #83


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1431
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



Nothing from Lick
http://www.universetoday.com/2009/10/09/lc...e-data-pending/


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Oct 9 2009, 01:33 PM
Post #84


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Oct 9 2009, 06:09 AM) *
...Go here for streamimg video from MMT...

I saw something on Twitter indicating MMT was out of focus so no useful data was gathered? ...but that's Twitter and could possibly be wrong rolleyes.gif


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Oct 9 2009, 01:34 PM
Post #85


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



I was watching MMT and the closeup did seem a bit blurry. The other view seemed ok.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AndyG
post Oct 9 2009, 01:40 PM
Post #86


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 593
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 279



QUOTE (Hungry4info @ Oct 9 2009, 02:25 PM) *

I just stacked a few of their frames and can see a bit fat nothing. Which is good, right? smile.gif

Andy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Littlebit
post Oct 9 2009, 01:44 PM
Post #87


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 153
Joined: 14-August 06
Member No.: 1041



Maybe they missed the target;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Oct 9 2009, 01:52 PM
Post #88


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



Somewhere way back, someone had posted an animated GIF showing a lunar impact as seen through a telescope. There was a tiny flash (you could almost imagine it going "piff").

I'd assumed that vaporizing a football field worth of lunar regolith would've made a bigger flash and a sunlit dust plume.

Guess not....


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ilbasso
post Oct 9 2009, 01:56 PM
Post #89


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 753
Joined: 23-October 04
From: Greensboro, NC USA
Member No.: 103



I was somewhat bemused by the confusion over the commanding being given to the Flight Director in the final 60 seconds before Centaur impact, to change a setting on the NIR instrument. "Was that November IR?" How much time was lost in that communication? Hopefully it didn't affect the collection of data. Just shows the unintended consequences of having two instruments with similar sounding acronyms, NIR and MIR.


--------------------
Jonathan Ward
Manning the LCC at http://www.apollolaunchcontrol.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Oct 9 2009, 01:59 PM
Post #90


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



Going back over the video, there was something in the infrared images that caught my eye.
I've taken 4 frames and put them in an animated gif.
Attached Image


You can see, almost in the middle here a small dot appear. Bright at the centre and a darker blue around it.
It may just be "noise", but it happens and in the audio on the TV coverage just a moment later they announce Centaur impact.

Not claiming anything here, just pointing it out. I suppose we'll know any minute now as the Press Conference is about to start.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AndyG
post Oct 9 2009, 02:03 PM
Post #91


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 593
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 279



Mmmm ... I've seen spacecraft disappear into craters before. laugh.gif

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Oct 9 2009, 02:14 PM
Post #92


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Oh how I wish Ames was as on the ball as JPL is with media graphics. Any sign of these cool slides anywhere on the Web?


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Oct 9 2009, 02:21 PM
Post #93


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



There was a 'flash' cool.gif

Here's the mission's image showing the 'flash' and I think it matches nicely to the spot I noticed in the animation.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
clad
post Oct 9 2009, 02:24 PM
Post #94


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 4-June 09
Member No.: 4810



I´ve a comment about the poor media coverage of this important event, i think this a important mission, can you imagine if we found water in the moon? all the things we can possible found with this discover? , NASA needs more advertise around the world to obtain more benefits, more support from all of us. The information in our present era is like gold, everybody needs to have it....

I would to say thanks to the people in this web page to keep us informed and post pics from the most important part of the mission, and of course a WELL DONE to NASA for this flawless mission.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Oct 9 2009, 02:31 PM
Post #95


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Rough animation from the frames of last 2 minutes of transmission (starting about 2.5min after Centur impact). The very last frames aren't included...

Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image

 


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Oct 9 2009, 02:38 PM
Post #96


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



Interesting comment regarding the integrated spectral data after the initial peak (Centaur impact).
"The observation that the line didn't return to zero is interesting." (paraphrased)

Did we make a smoldering crater?


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Oct 9 2009, 02:39 PM
Post #97


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (Juramike @ Oct 9 2009, 08:52 AM) *
....I'd assumed that vaporizing a football field worth of lunar regolith would've made a bigger flash and a sunlit dust plume....

Are you referring to the LCROSS crater? That was predicted to be 60 meters in diameter. It would take about 15 of those to cover a football field.

To everyone: I hope the press conference has dispelled the uncharacteristic negative attitudes I see expressed in many of the post impact comments.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc
post Oct 9 2009, 02:44 PM
Post #98


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 276
Joined: 11-December 07
From: Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Member No.: 3978



Indeed there was a flash. Hardly more than a few pixels. But its there and the UV radiance data being presented proves it. The size is as expected...


--------------------
We talk of nothing but Curiosity here
Follow me on twitter or Google +
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Oct 9 2009, 02:48 PM
Post #99


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



Yes but the whole episode was over-hyped. Todays public expects to see what they expect to see !
A pixel or 2 on a camera ain't going to do it. As a co-worker said "is that all we get for 79 million ?"

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Oct 9 2009, 02:51 PM
Post #100


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (MahFL @ Oct 9 2009, 09:48 AM) *
A pixel or 2 on a camera ain't going to do it. As a co-worker said "is that all we get for 79 million ?"

I'll paraphrase from the press conference:

'THE SPECTRA IS WHERE THE SCIENCE IS AT.'

We pay for the science, not the spectacle.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

17 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2024 - 06:04 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.