3D shape, cartography, and geoid of Comet 67P C-G |
3D shape, cartography, and geoid of Comet 67P C-G |
Aug 6 2014, 02:11 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10256 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Explorer 1 said:
"A 2D map of C-G seems like a tough order; the projection math alone..." Don't worry! If you can put a grid on the surface (as we have seen already), you can warp that grid into any map projection you like. Mapping will be no huge problem - in fact I expect they have a rough one already (I've been playing with one myself). Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Dec 5 2014, 02:43 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10256 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Hi Chuck - I think it's premature. Despite the wonderful images we have of the northern hemisphere, we have practically nothing in the south (it was literally nothing until we began to get a few dark limbs silhouetted against the background coma). This time next year we'll have global imaging and a full shape model.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Dec 6 2014, 03:40 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 140 Joined: 20-November 07 Member No.: 3967 |
Hi Chuck - I think it's premature. Despite the wonderful images we have of the northern hemisphere, we have practically nothing in the south. This time next year we'll have global imaging and a full shape model. Phil Well, granted, but even if we have no global imaging, a constant-scale natural boundary map, made from the tentative shape model, would display graticles and topological districts in reasonably accurate proportions. After the shape model is refined, I could adjust the map accordingly. And as the images arrive, we'd have the mapping blank (so to speak) ready to go. Note that the empty grid of a constant-scale natural boundary map, unlike an empty grid in a conventional projection, captures district proportions, so topological content (or at least prototopological, i.e. folding, content) is transformed to the plane. The downside would be we'd need to make two models with incised graticles, and I'd have to do the handwork twice, but that's not such a big investment of time, is it?, in order to have an accurate mapping blank ready to accept images as they arrive. The investment of dollars to make the model twice is a consideration, too, but these days that's not much dough, either. Less than the cost of driving Atlanta to Houston. Otherwise, in the interim, we have to endure viewing the available images in grossly distorting formats. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 11:59 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |