Voyager 2 imaging of Triton |
Voyager 2 imaging of Triton |
Mar 7 2006, 04:15 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 159 Joined: 4-March 06 Member No.: 694 |
I was just wondering if someone has "super enhanced" the Voyager 2 images of Neptune's largest moon Triton and made them available to the public? I've read about and seen it done on Voyager images of Saturn's moons. Considering there won't be an orbiter going to Neptune being launched for a long time, this could be very worth while idea.
-------------------- I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that I have set before thee life and death, the blessing and the curse; therefore choose life, that thou mayest live, thou and thy seed.
- Opening line from episode 13 of "Cosmos" |
|
|
Nov 7 2021, 04:23 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 934 Joined: 4-September 06 From: Boston Member No.: 1102 |
It is not clear to me what what areas you refer to as recovered in your posts. Maybe you could post three image, the original image unmodified, your clean modified image, and the area of interest (ie newly recovered area) circled or specifically delineated. The cloud of dots past the teminator in the image above seem to me to be noise, but maybe that is not the area you are describing.
-------------------- |
|
|
Nov 7 2021, 04:46 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
By no means is doing this with images that someone has already processed for another purpose the best way to proceed. Whatever artifacts they may have introduced at very low values (0, 1, 2) is part of what you're trying to make something of now. There are multiple obvious artifacts and there's no accounting therefore for what is artifact and what isn't.
Never with work like this should you begin with an image that someone posted after performing undocumented processing to the original. |
|
|
Nov 7 2021, 07:30 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 127 Joined: 15-April 21 Member No.: 9009 |
By no means is doing this with images that someone has already processed for another purpose the best way to proceed. Whatever artifacts they may have introduced at very low values (0, 1, 2) is part of what you're trying to make something of now. There are multiple obvious artifacts and there's no accounting therefore for what is artifact and what isn't. Never with work like this should you begin with an image that someone posted after performing undocumented processing to the original. all the images on USGS PILOT are low resolution, and are full of jpeg artifacts, witch destroys any detail from potential neptuneshine or atmospheric haze lit terrain (same goes for PDS Image Atlas) so where can i go to get original unprocessed images that doesn't have jpeg artifacts and is a good resolution |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th September 2024 - 08:38 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |