Hayabusa - The Return To Earth, The voyage home |
Hayabusa - The Return To Earth, The voyage home |
Nov 28 2005, 03:08 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 510 Joined: 17-March 05 From: Southeast Michigan Member No.: 209 |
...starting a new thread for Hayabusa's sampling feedback and the return voyage.
After its nail-biting success in November, will there be enough fuel for the Falcon to make it home? -------------------- --O'Dave
|
|
|
Dec 19 2005, 07:38 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
Holder of the Two Leashes:
"The reason it didn't show much surface variation is because, as this instrument discovered, there was no significate variation to report. " I remain unconvinced of that. The areas of greatest color and albedo variation, or features where composition variations might be expected, were generally well below 1/2 km in size. I'm specifically referring to the high albedo steep slopes inside the freshest craters and the small, slightly darker than general regolith smooth "ponds" in crater bottoms. I note that the camera, which had a TINY CCD detector with non-square pixels and high noise levels (obvious in low-contrast stretched images of a high contrast target) had real trouble seeing color variations, but they were there once enough pixels on a target were averaged. Global color variations are near zero, but weak local ones, mostly on 100 or 50 meter scales and smaller are present. I expect/suspect similar ones were present in infrared wavelengths but were undetected due to resolution and possible signal/noise factors. |
|
|
Dec 19 2005, 08:54 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 544 Joined: 17-November 05 From: Oklahoma Member No.: 557 |
QUOTE (edstrick @ Dec 19 2005, 01:38 PM) I note that the camera, which had a TINY CCD detector with non-square pixels and high noise levels (obvious in low-contrast stretched images of a high contrast target) had real trouble seeing color variations, but they were there once enough pixels on a target were averaged. Global color variations are near zero, but weak local ones, mostly on 100 or 50 meter scales and smaller are present. I expect/suspect similar ones were present in infrared wavelengths but were undetected due to resolution and possible signal/noise factors. I misunderstood you completely. I thought you were saying that the NIS could not resolve any part of Eros. One theory about part of the variation you're talking about is that the color differences are due to the fresh material being "unweathered". One other thing I don't understand, though, is what your whole point is. Are you saying NEAR should have been put off for five years in order to get more advanced infrared detector technology? Or perhaps you are saying the United States should have scuttled the NEAR and Deep Space 1 programs, waited for some other nation (perhaps Japan) to fly both a dedicated asteroid mission and ion engine driven spacecraft first, and then build our own programs on their experience more cheaply? |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th November 2024 - 06:02 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |