2003 Ub 313: The Incredible Shrinking Planet?, No bigger than Pluto? |
2003 Ub 313: The Incredible Shrinking Planet?, No bigger than Pluto? |
Guest_BruceMoomaw_* |
Jan 31 2006, 09:20 PM
Post
#1
|
Guests |
|
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 09:36 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Jan 31 2006, 01:20 PM) Actually SigurRosFan deserves the credit! I must get half of my blog entry material from the sharp-eyed people on this site... http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...indpost&p=39115 Since I posted that, I've gotten an email from someone saying that there will be a publication in Nature tomorrow that flip-flops again on the size of UB313 -- hopefully another sharp-eyed watcher will post that link here as soon as it appears! --Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Feb 1 2006, 05:48 PM
Post
#3
|
Guests |
QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Jan 31 2006, 09:36 PM) Since I posted that, I've gotten an email from someone saying that there will be a publication in Nature tomorrow that flip-flops again on the size of UB313 -- hopefully another sharp-eyed watcher will post that link here as soon as it appears! From the February 2, 2006, issue of Nature: One over the nine. |
|
|
Feb 1 2006, 07:17 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
Incidentally, don't forget that Pluto "shrank" throughout its lifetime, too, in at least two steps. I can remember when it was bigger than Mercury, and maybe bigger than Mars.
It would be interesting if size estimates consistently shrank for newly-discovered objects, as though there were a regression to the mean effect, or a pro-big bias on the part of the early researchers... Who wants to think that they discovered something tiny? PS: Titan has shrunk a bit, too... |
|
|
Feb 2 2006, 12:27 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 288 Joined: 28-September 05 From: Orion arm Member No.: 516 |
QUOTE (JRehling @ Feb 1 2006, 09:17 PM) Incidentally, don't forget that Pluto "shrank" throughout its lifetime, too, in at least two steps. I can remember when it was bigger than Mercury, and maybe bigger than Mars. It would be interesting if size estimates consistently shrank for newly-discovered objects, as though there were a regression to the mean effect, or a pro-big bias on the part of the early researchers... Who wants to think that they discovered something tiny? PS: Titan has shrunk a bit, too... ...as Triton did. As child I read in an old astronomy library book from the '50s - I think it was from Otto Struve - Triton's diameter should be ~6000 km: 'Wow, a moon nearly as large as Mars...' I'm not quite sure what it was before Voyager II - maybe about 3500 km, but at the the end it came down to poorly 2720 km, probably the same size as UB313 now. If we get more cases like Pluto, Triton, UB313, we'll find a 'shrinking law' from 'detection-diameter' to real diameter at the end... Bye. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 11:00 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |