IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Enceladus E03 Flyby
tedstryk
post Feb 17 2005, 03:26 PM
Post #16


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...8/N00028164.jpg

This image shows what I am talking about. If you look at the lower right, there seems to be some kind of terrain is at this resolution craterless and appears to be on top of the terrain we are now looking at, even possibly cutting one crater in half. I wonder if E4 will get us coverage of this!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Feb 17 2005, 03:26 PM
Post #17





Guests






QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 17 2005, 03:01 PM)
QUOTE (Sunspot @ Feb 17 2005, 02:50 PM)
Why is there so much missing data on the right hand side?  Can they correct that?

It's not missing - it's interlaced smile.gif

unsure.gif .....ummmmmmm what does that mean lol unsure.gif

Whenever I saw pictures like that I always assumed it was a problem with the camera lol
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Feb 17 2005, 03:28 PM
Post #18


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Not sure exactly what it means - but if I de-interlace it in photoshop, it goes away smile.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Feb 17 2005, 03:37 PM
Post #19





Guests






http://www.planetary.org/news/2005/cassini..._peek_0216.html

The images posted above were captured only hours ago. They were posted on the website of the Cassini imaging team as part of a new effort to get images from the most interesting encounters out to the public as quickly as possible. Not all of Cassini's images will be released in this way, but unlike the images available on the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's Cassini raw images website, these so-called "raw preview" images have been processed to remove noise and artifacts caused by imperfections in the camera hardware and electronics.

Lots more HERE
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Feb 17 2005, 05:02 PM
Post #20


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Just staring in awe at this image... ohmy.gif

http://ciclops.lpl.arizona.edu/ir_index.php?id=10

("Preview 6")


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Feb 17 2005, 05:06 PM
Post #21


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (Sunspot @ Feb 17 2005, 08:26 AM)
QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 17 2005, 03:01 PM)
QUOTE (Sunspot @ Feb 17 2005, 02:50 PM)
Why is there so much missing data on the right hand side?  Can they correct that?

It's not missing - it's interlaced smile.gif

unsure.gif .....ummmmmmm what does that mean lol unsure.gif

Whenever I saw pictures like that I always assumed it was a problem with the camera lol

In lossless compression mode, we tell the camera to expect a certain number of bits per line. In this case the entropy in the images combined with their higher bits per pixel caused us to go over that estimate. When that happens, the camera stops reading out every other line and we get truncated lines. Over-estimating is also bad since the bits per pixel is used to estimate our data volume, which is carefully negotiated between the various instrument teams. If we over estimate, we would have to plan for fewer images.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DEChengst
post Feb 17 2005, 05:44 PM
Post #22


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 270
Joined: 29-December 04
From: NLA0:
Member No.: 133



Two quick mosaics:

http://paranoid.dechengst.nl/saturn/Enceladus1.jpg

http://paranoid.dechengst.nl/saturn/Enceladus2.jpg

EDIT:

Because I couldn't get the brightness difference between images corrected in a good way, I replaced #2 with a non corrected one. Correcting made one part of the image look good and the other not very good so I decided to go for the best detail in the images and just accept the brightness differences.

These two images show what happens if I do correct for the brightness differences:

http://paranoid.dechengst.nl/saturn/Enceladus2a.jpg
http://paranoid.dechengst.nl/saturn/Enceladus2b.jpg


--------------------
PDP, VAX and Alpha fanatic ; HP-Compaq is the Satan! ; Let us pray daily while facing Maynard! ; Life starts at 150 km/h ;
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
erwan
post Feb 17 2005, 07:53 PM
Post #23


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 180
Joined: 31-January 05
From: Brittany (France)
Member No.: 164



Thank you DEChengst for Enceladus mosaics. I prefer the uncorrected for brightness version of the mosaic. Have you tried to apply a kind of black to white gradient Y mask to each frames before stitching? Maybe this could help to correct brighness differences? I have try such an analogous method to eliminate "vignetting" in MER pancam images before stitching, with some results...


--------------------

Erwann
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Feb 17 2005, 08:19 PM
Post #24


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



http://mer.rlproject.com/enc_ir3_g_uv.jpg

http://mer.rlproject.com/enc_narrow_1.jpg

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Feb 17 2005, 08:56 PM
Post #25





Guests






Did they take any images around closest approach? The closest image I could find so far was about 7000 miles.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Feb 17 2005, 11:30 PM
Post #26


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (Sunspot @ Feb 17 2005, 01:56 PM)
Did they take any images around closest approach? The closest image I could find so far was about 7000 miles.

yes, but they haven't been played back yet. They were supposed to last night but I'm guessing it will carryover to tonight's downlink


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Feb 18 2005, 04:01 AM
Post #27


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Anyone know the geometry of this encounter? We must be seeing Enceladus against the dark side of Saturn in this image: Casini image

Extremely cool!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Feb 18 2005, 04:08 AM
Post #28


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



I saw that earlier, the caption said Saturn was in the background.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Feb 18 2005, 12:14 PM
Post #29





Guests






New RAW images posted as Cassini looked back at Enceladus - but no high res images at closest approach sad.gif Maybe during the next flyby.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Feb 18 2005, 12:55 PM
Post #30


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



I think it is more likely that they just haven't been released. During the Iapetus flyby there were missing images on the "raw" page for the longest time.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 03:24 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.