IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

66 Pages V  « < 45 46 47 48 49 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Mission: Hayabusa 2
Marcin600
post Feb 28 2019, 04:18 PM
Post #691


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 435
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



QUOTE (nprev @ Feb 26 2019, 06:18 AM) *
Doesn't seem that mysterious. Just about any impact large enough to leave a meter-sized crater or so likely provides enough energy to eject a fair amount of small regolith constituents from at least the general area around the impact site at escape velocity, and possibly even on the antipodal side as well if the internal structure of Ryugu is such that foci exist. Over time the rate of loss probably is greater than the rate of formation.

And yet scientists and designers of Hayabusa 2 seemed quite surprised by the lack / deficiency of the smallest particles of regolith (dust and sand) on Ryugu's surface.
If the mechanism you describe works, and at least some of the small asteroids are considered a pile of debris, then one can expect that the smaller the asteroid, the larger the rocks on the surface. I am curious about the results from OSIRIS-REx at Bennu. A lot of explanations will also bring results from MASCOT if they finally appear. The copper projectile will also tell a lot about Ryugu's surface. And of course, with a bit of luck, the content of the return capsule - but it still requires a lot of patience...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Feb 28 2019, 10:27 PM
Post #692


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10153
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Impact ejecta particles will have a wide range of velocities. Look at Tycho crater on the Moon, where some ejecta can travel across much of the near side of the Moon, or even possibly converge on its antipode, but much more of it by volume was only just able to get out of the crater and covered the surface as a thick continuous ejecta blanket. Some didn't even get out and slumped back into the crater. On Ryugu, some ejecta might fly out at escape volocity, but some impact energy goes into jostling the blocks near the impact, breaking them into smaller pieces and no doubt generating dust in the process. There should be dust, and impacts cannot preferentially remove it as ejecta.

Large particles are often observed to collect at the top of a container of mixed particle sizes (the 'brazil nut effect'). The chances are that there is plenty of dust on Ryugu, but the bigger chunks are concentrated at the surface and the dust drains down into the voids between them. I think that is what we are seeing at Ryugu. We woild only need a very thin layer of it on the surface blocks to produce a visible effect when thrusters blow it away, and that amount would not be visible in the kind of images we have been seeing of the surface.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Mar 3 2019, 06:25 PM
Post #693


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 435
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Feb 28 2019, 11:27 PM) *
Impact ejecta particles will have a wide range of velocities. Look at Tycho crater on the Moon, where some ejecta can travel across much of the near side of the Moon, or even possibly converge on its antipode, but much more of it by volume was only just able to get out of the crater and covered the surface as a thick continuous ejecta blanket. Some didn't even get out and slumped back into the crater. On Ryugu, some ejecta might fly out at escape volocity, but some impact energy goes into jostling the blocks near the impact, breaking them into smaller pieces and no doubt generating dust in the process. There should be dust, and impacts cannot preferentially remove it as ejecta.

Large particles are often observed to collect at the top of a container of mixed particle sizes (the 'brazil nut effect'). The chances are that there is plenty of dust on Ryugu, but the bigger chunks are concentrated at the surface and the dust drains down into the voids between them. I think that is what we are seeing at Ryugu. We woild only need a very thin layer of it on the surface blocks to produce a visible effect when thrusters blow it away, and that amount would not be visible in the kind of images we have been seeing of the surface.

Phil



I agree with you, Phil, that "BNF" (I mean the "Brazil Nuts Effect") is a good candidate to explain the situation on the surface of Ryugu.
But, as a complete amateur, I have two questions:
1. Does "BNF" operate without gravity or in very low gravity as on Ryugu?
2. Does "BNF" work without "walls of the container" (as on Ryugu)?

I also remember that even on such a large globe as the Moon, dust can electrostatically levitate just above the surface - contrary to the force of quite high gravity, and therefore, potentially against the settling in the voids in the depths of the asteroid too.

Marcin
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
yoichi
post Mar 5 2019, 06:51 AM
Post #694


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 14
Joined: 30-September 14
Member No.: 7269



press release in english.
http://fanfun.jaxa.jp/jaxatv/files/20190305_hayabusa2_en.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3hO58HFa1M
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Mar 5 2019, 07:41 AM
Post #695


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10153
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



I updated the map of Ryugu with information from the new press release - may I say here how great the Hayabusa 2 press releases have been, just incredibly informative and detailed.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Mar 5 2019, 11:42 AM
Post #696


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



I didn't realize that the impactor is going to target poor Mascot, more or less...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Mar 5 2019, 03:45 PM
Post #697


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2082
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



Astounding views of the sampling! Looks like plenty of debris could have gone into the funnel. Looks like some pieces hit the side of the spacecraft too, judging from the video.
Hard to believe, but the SCI impact next month will be even more impressive (from a safe distance!).

It appears from the press release that they may still release the final rover this summer. Even if it's not working properly, surely there's not point in lugging that mass back to Earth.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Mar 7 2019, 07:55 AM
Post #698


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



QUOTE (yoichi @ Mar 5 2019, 07:51 AM) *


one question comes to my mind after seeing the video, that I have not seen addressed: are all of the flying debris still gravitationally bound to Ryugu? will they fall back on it? will they end up in orbit? are we witnessing the birth of a mini-moon? or, finally, will they end in separate solar orbit?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pandaneko
post Mar 7 2019, 12:20 PM
Post #699


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 817
Joined: 17-April 10
From: Kamakura, Japan
Member No.: 5323



Why is it that the same fragments look shiny and then dark as they fly up rotating?

P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
abalone
post Mar 7 2019, 12:27 PM
Post #700


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 362
Joined: 12-June 05
From: Kiama, Australia
Member No.: 409



QUOTE (Paolo @ Mar 7 2019, 06:55 PM) *
one question comes to my mind after seeing the video, that I have not seen addressed: are all of the flying debris still gravitationally bound to Ryugu? will they fall back on it? will they end up in orbit? are we witnessing the birth of a mini-moon? or, finally, will they end in separate solar orbit?

Almost all of the fragments will either have escape velocity and disappear or not quite enough and settle back on the surface. A single kick from the surface can put an object into orbit but this orbit will have a perigee that is the same as the point it was kick off the surface. To go into a stable orbit it needs a second kick at some altitude above the surface to raise it perigee off the asteroids surface. The escape velocity is about 0.38m/s or about 1.35 km/h. This is one of the reasons why a cannon shell can not be fired into a stable orbit.

QUOTE (pandaneko @ Mar 7 2019, 11:20 PM) *
Why is it that the same fragments look shiny and then dark as they fly up rotating?

P

Id say some are sun illuminated and some in shadow
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AndyG
post Mar 7 2019, 03:42 PM
Post #701


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 593
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 279



QUOTE (abalone @ Mar 7 2019, 12:27 PM) *
To go into a stable orbit it needs a second kick at some altitude above the surface to raise it perigee off the asteroids surface.


Yes. I'm mentally trying to calculate if slower-moving particles ejected in the initial impact could provide such a second kick to (returning) higher-speed ejecta. Higher speed here being less than the 0.38 m/s escape velocity.

Must be a tiny amount of the total ejected material put into such an orbit.

Andy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
anticitizen2
post Mar 8 2019, 02:32 AM
Post #702


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 201
Joined: 16-December 13
Member No.: 7067



what do you think the bright spot is?

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Mar 8 2019, 04:15 AM
Post #703


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2082
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



The target marker? Looks like the right area based on the new maps...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Mar 9 2019, 07:09 PM
Post #704


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 435
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



And yet some dust probably (from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3hO58HFa1M)
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcin600
post Mar 9 2019, 07:52 PM
Post #705


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 435
Joined: 14-December 15
Member No.: 7860



floating piece of gravel - quite flat
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

66 Pages V  « < 45 46 47 48 49 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 11:41 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.