IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

8 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Radar And Mariner 10, Best possible mapping, pre-Messenger
nprev
post Dec 6 2007, 08:21 PM
Post #69


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 6 2007, 11:34 AM) *
We're going to see a brand new planet when those first Messenger images come in.


Yeah, I think that's a truism based on experience. Seems like our initial flybys almost invariably miss the most interesting features of a given target for whatever reason...


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
4th rock from th...
post Dec 6 2007, 09:01 PM
Post #70


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 378
Joined: 21-April 05
From: Portugal
Member No.: 347



Hi,

Ok, here's the familiar Mercury map with a color/albedo overlay from two Mariner 10 images made from different filters. Colors are approximate and perhaps a little to saturated but it's a start.
Attached Image


--------------------
_______________________
www.astrosurf.com/nunes
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
t_oner
post Dec 6 2007, 09:39 PM
Post #71


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 106
Joined: 26-September 05
Member No.: 508



Here it is. Some notes about the map: It was constructed by me from the mosaics created for the Atlas of Mercury by NASA, (thanks to NSSDC for supplying the digital data). Becuse of discrepancies in the original mosaics this map may have errors as large as a few degrees. The original is 12K but only 4K fits to the 1MB limit here. With other regions added we may have to compress it more.

It is in simple cylindrical projection with 0 degrees longitude at the center. Some of the missing parts are the missing parts of the mosaics which are possible to fill with Mariner 10 data. First I think we should do this. And please add the radar data last as they have North-South ambiguity.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
t_oner
post Dec 7 2007, 09:33 AM
Post #72


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 106
Joined: 26-September 05
Member No.: 508



And here is version 2 with some fills.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CAP-Team
post Dec 7 2007, 05:58 PM
Post #73


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 146
Joined: 23-August 06
From: Vriezenveen, Netherlands
Member No.: 1067



Here's a map of Mercury that I've been using for a couple of months now, I've added some radar information that's available on the web.


Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gcecil
post Dec 8 2007, 02:11 AM
Post #74


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 16
Joined: 8-August 07
Member No.: 3138



QUOTE (CAP-Team @ Dec 7 2007, 12:58 PM) *
Here's a map of Mercury that I've been using for a couple of months now, I've added some radar information that's available on the web.


Attached Image


This map includes recent (reported within last 2 wks) amateur imaging (290-360 deg) by John Boudreau and our SOAR telescope imaging from earlier in the yr (185-290 deg), only to +-70 deg lat shown however. Alignment along longitudes of bright features (all rayed radar craters) is an artifact of the phase correction. Agreement with rayed radar craters and their diameters is given in our paper.

http://stew.physics.unc.edu/MercuryComposite.jpg

( large image removed, replaced with link. Not everyone has 100 Mbit internet and 2500 pixel wide monitors - DOUG)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Dec 8 2007, 02:42 AM
Post #75


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



Welcome Gerald. Thanks for the links to your paper.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
t_oner
post Dec 8 2007, 10:17 AM
Post #76


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 106
Joined: 26-September 05
Member No.: 508



Hi gcecil, thanks for the map but it seems to have some serious scale problems, Mariner 10 data covers more longitudes than it should. I think there was a mistake in compositing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
edstrick
post Dec 8 2007, 11:46 AM
Post #77


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



Mariner 10 took a series of approach <crescent> data for something like 6 days and outgoing data for maybe 3. Granted, the furthest out data is pretty horribly low rez, but the data shows stuff beyond the terminator on both approach and flyout. That's how the large crater "Mozart", south of Caloris, was discovered. It's not in the high rez mosaics.

Some of the data was lost or truncated by camera wander due to Mariner's large attitude control slop, and I vaguely recall some color band data may have been smeared by the wander, or some data was over-exposed, but I've always wanted to see the several frame zoom "movie" from approach and flyout, both at native resolution, and rescaled to a uniform diameter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
t_oner
post Dec 8 2007, 12:13 PM
Post #78


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 106
Joined: 26-September 05
Member No.: 508



I am not sure if edstrick's post is an answer to my post but let me make it clear: Mariner 10 high res data covers 190 to 10 degrees longitude, not 190 to -10 as in gcecil's map. That map has a scale problem.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gcecil
post Dec 8 2007, 01:19 PM
Post #79


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 16
Joined: 8-August 07
Member No.: 3138



QUOTE (Tayfun Öner @ Dec 8 2007, 07:13 AM) *
I am not sure if edstrick's post is an answer to my post but let me make it clear: Mariner 10 high res data covers 190 to 10 degrees longitude, not 190 to -10 as in gcecil's map. That map has a scale problem.


Yup, scale was messed up when I cutoff at +/-70 lat. Fixed now, so reposting with proper format. Thank you!

This map
Attached Image
(full res image here) includes recent (reported within last 2 wks) amateur imaging (290-360 deg) by John Boudreau and our SOAR telescope imaging from earlier in the yr (185-290 deg), only to +-70 deg lat shown. Hints of topography near the terminator in our data (e.g. other half of Mozart), elsewhere mostly bright rayed radar craters. Alignment along longitudes of bright features is an artifact of the phase correction. Agreement with rayed radar craters (and their diameters) is given in our paper.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
t_oner
post Dec 8 2007, 02:35 PM
Post #80


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 106
Joined: 26-September 05
Member No.: 508



Here is Version 3 with optical data added from Baumgardner et al. Cosmetically corrected for Celestia.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
edstrick
post Dec 9 2007, 10:11 AM
Post #81


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



I didn't spot the scale problem, I was just pointing that to some extend, Mariner 10 converage extends beyond the high-rez mosaic's terminations at the terminators.

Did Mariner really say "I'll be back!"?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Dec 14 2007, 03:56 AM
Post #82


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Here is an example of a Mariner set that shows a bit beyond what the high resolution images show. This is the same set of images, processed to look relatively natural on the left and with heavy high-pass filtering on the right.

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peter59
post Dec 30 2007, 09:13 AM
Post #83


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 568
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Silesia
Member No.: 299



I recognize that many of you are waiting for new images of Mercury, but you can't also see old images.

Attached Image

Tape MVE_033 Image 091 (29 November 1973)


--------------------
Free software for planetary science (including Cassini Image Viewer).
http://members.tripod.com/petermasek/marinerall.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

8 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th May 2024 - 01:17 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.