LCROSS Lunar Impact |
LCROSS Lunar Impact |
Oct 16 2009, 07:12 PM
Post
#211
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2920 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
Wanna get the water story of the Moon? Get Oppy from Mars and put her there.
-------------------- |
|
|
Oct 16 2009, 07:26 PM
Post
#212
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
New data and images released today, but still no word on what the spectrometer detected.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS/m...OSS_impact.html http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS/m...act_images.html --Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Oct 17 2009, 02:10 PM
Post
#213
|
|
Forum Contributor Group: Members Posts: 1372 Joined: 8-February 04 From: North East Florida, USA. Member No.: 11 |
I am sorry but that first image seems to me rather underwhelming.
|
|
|
Oct 17 2009, 02:15 PM
Post
#214
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Can we stop with the "I'm disappointed" and "this is underwhelming" whining already?
If you wanna watch unrealistic fireworks, go watch a Hollywood blockbuster movie or something. LCROSS wasn't done for the awe factor but science returned. -------------------- |
|
|
Oct 17 2009, 02:38 PM
Post
#215
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2173 Joined: 28-December 04 From: Florida, USA Member No.: 132 |
Can we stop with the "I'm disappointed" and "this is underwhelming" whining already? Bravo! That "underwhelming" image is the first solid indication that LCROSS may meet all it's science goals. What more do you want from a science mission!? I resisted the temptation to post first after Emily because I wanted to allow time for the naysayers to repent on their own terms. That worked out well. |
|
|
Oct 17 2009, 02:53 PM
Post
#216
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 877 Joined: 7-March 05 From: Switzerland Member No.: 186 |
Right! But they better had involved Hollywood which had added quite a bit explosive to make it clear for the public/audience
Btw. Carry along something like a bomb wouldn't that have been better anyway (in terms of getting better signal/measurements) - unless I'm totally wrong. -------------------- |
|
|
Oct 17 2009, 03:18 PM
Post
#217
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 214 Joined: 30-December 05 Member No.: 628 |
Quote: "In the coming weeks, the LCROSS team and other observation assets will continue to analyze and verify data collected from the LCROSS impacts. Any new information will undergo the normal scientific review process and will be released as soon as it is available."
I hope this doesn't mean that they will try to sit on any spectroscopic (water / no water) findings until an article has cleared peer review. In the event of a positive finding, I doubt it could be kept secret anyway. |
|
|
Oct 17 2009, 03:21 PM
Post
#218
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
In recent years, the big journals have been pretty good about allowing significant results to be announced in advance of publication. When they've got a concrete result, I'm sure they'll announce it.
--Greg |
|
|
Oct 17 2009, 04:04 PM
Post
#219
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
The first event I'm looking toward where there may be any semi-public discussion of scientific findings will be the next Lunar Exploration and Analysis Group (LEAG) meeting, which is Nov 16-19. All of day 2 (Nov 17) will be devoted to LRO and LCROSS.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/leag2009/ --Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Oct 17 2009, 08:26 PM
Post
#220
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 2-August 08 Member No.: 4281 |
QUOTE "There is a clear indication of a plume of vapor and fine debris," said Colaprete. Significant? |
|
|
Oct 17 2009, 08:43 PM
Post
#221
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 233 Joined: 21-April 05 Member No.: 328 |
QUOTE The basic idea is that a disappointment is best handled by acknowledging it as such -- THEN you can wake the morrow morn with some more hopeful thoughts. The point being that disappointment with the size of the plume does not equate to naysaying regarding the entire mission. I am now as ready as anyone to be pleasantly surprised by the spectroscopic results! |
|
|
Oct 17 2009, 10:14 PM
Post
#222
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Significant? It just means that stuff is in a gas phase instead of being dust. A vapor of what, is the question. --Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Oct 18 2009, 12:28 PM
Post
#223
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 128 Joined: 10-December 06 From: Atlanta Member No.: 1472 |
New data and images released today, but still no word on what the spectrometer detected. I found the total radiance graph http://www.nasa.gov/394533main_VSP-NSP-total-radiance.png very interesting. It seems that there is a drop in mid IR radiance in the first few seconds after the impact. Water has a very high absorbance in mid IR and I wonder whether this graph has a water signiture. Does anyone know how dust would behave? |
|
|
Oct 18 2009, 12:42 PM
Post
#224
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 258 Joined: 22-December 06 Member No.: 1503 |
error page...page not found. Perhaps it was posted by mistake and quickly taken down.
Edit: or was it just a bad link you posted? |
|
|
Oct 18 2009, 12:54 PM
Post
#225
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 813 Joined: 8-February 04 From: Arabia Terra Member No.: 12 |
Remove the ) from the end of the URL.
Edit: Corrected now. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 05:08 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |