IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

17 Pages V  « < 13 14 15 16 17 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
LCROSS Lunar Impact
climber
post Oct 16 2009, 07:12 PM
Post #211


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



Wanna get the water story of the Moon? Get Oppy from Mars and put her there.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Oct 16 2009, 07:26 PM
Post #212


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



New data and images released today, but still no word on what the spectrometer detected.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS/m...OSS_impact.html
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS/m...act_images.html

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Oct 17 2009, 02:10 PM
Post #213


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



I am sorry but that first image seems to me rather underwhelming.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Oct 17 2009, 02:15 PM
Post #214


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Can we stop with the "I'm disappointed" and "this is underwhelming" whining already?
If you wanna watch unrealistic fireworks, go watch a Hollywood blockbuster movie or something. LCROSS wasn't done for the awe factor but science returned.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Oct 17 2009, 02:38 PM
Post #215


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (ugordan @ Oct 17 2009, 09:15 AM) *
Can we stop with the "I'm disappointed" and "this is underwhelming" whining already?

Bravo!
That "underwhelming" image is the first solid indication that LCROSS may meet all it's science goals. What more do you want from a science mission!?

I resisted the temptation to post first after Emily because I wanted to allow time for the naysayers to repent on their own terms. That worked out well. rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tman
post Oct 17 2009, 02:53 PM
Post #216


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



Right! But they better had involved Hollywood which had added quite a bit explosive to make it clear for the public/audience laugh.gif

Btw. Carry along something like a bomb wouldn't that have been better anyway (in terms of getting better signal/measurements) - unless I'm totally wrong.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tanjent
post Oct 17 2009, 03:18 PM
Post #217


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 214
Joined: 30-December 05
Member No.: 628



Quote: "In the coming weeks, the LCROSS team and other observation assets will continue to analyze and verify data collected from the LCROSS impacts. Any new information will undergo the normal scientific review process and will be released as soon as it is available."

I hope this doesn't mean that they will try to sit on any spectroscopic (water / no water) findings until an article has cleared peer review. In the event of a positive finding, I doubt it could be kept secret anyway.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Oct 17 2009, 03:21 PM
Post #218


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



In recent years, the big journals have been pretty good about allowing significant results to be announced in advance of publication. When they've got a concrete result, I'm sure they'll announce it.

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Oct 17 2009, 04:04 PM
Post #219


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



The first event I'm looking toward where there may be any semi-public discussion of scientific findings will be the next Lunar Exploration and Analysis Group (LEAG) meeting, which is Nov 16-19. All of day 2 (Nov 17) will be devoted to LRO and LCROSS.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/leag2009/

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Copella
post Oct 17 2009, 08:26 PM
Post #220


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 2-August 08
Member No.: 4281



QUOTE
"There is a clear indication of a plume of vapor and fine debris," said Colaprete.


Significant?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glennwsmith
post Oct 17 2009, 08:43 PM
Post #221


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 21-April 05
Member No.: 328



QUOTE
The basic idea is that a disappointment is best handled by acknowledging it as such -- THEN you can wake the morrow morn with some more hopeful thoughts.


The point being that disappointment with the size of the plume does not equate to naysaying regarding the entire mission. I am now as ready as anyone to be pleasantly surprised by the spectroscopic results!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Oct 17 2009, 10:14 PM
Post #222


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



QUOTE (John Copella @ Oct 17 2009, 01:26 PM) *
Significant?

It just means that stuff is in a gas phase instead of being dust. A vapor of what, is the question.

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
siravan
post Oct 18 2009, 12:28 PM
Post #223


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 128
Joined: 10-December 06
From: Atlanta
Member No.: 1472



QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Oct 16 2009, 03:26 PM) *
New data and images released today, but still no word on what the spectrometer detected.


I found the total radiance graph http://www.nasa.gov/394533main_VSP-NSP-total-radiance.png very interesting. It seems that there is a drop in mid IR radiance in the first few seconds after the impact. Water has a very high absorbance in mid IR and I wonder whether this graph has a water signiture. Does anyone know how dust would behave?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MarsIsImportant
post Oct 18 2009, 12:42 PM
Post #224


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 258
Joined: 22-December 06
Member No.: 1503



error page...page not found. Perhaps it was posted by mistake and quickly taken down.

Edit: or was it just a bad link you posted?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SFJCody
post Oct 18 2009, 12:54 PM
Post #225


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Arabia Terra
Member No.: 12



Remove the ) from the end of the URL.



Edit: Corrected now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

17 Pages V  « < 13 14 15 16 17 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 05:08 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.