Mars Express Color Images |
Mars Express Color Images |
Jun 15 2006, 01:19 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 63 Joined: 4-May 05 Member No.: 378 |
Bob,
Thanks for the detailed response. I was taking ESA's word for the volcanic thing, it's been 1/2 a lifetime and change since I last studied geology and I remember just enough to understand what people are talking about. Wouldn't it be fun to be there, just walking around ... Stephen -------------------- Popper: A party entertainment, filled with confetti and a small explosive charge.
|
|
|
Jun 18 2006, 10:07 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 241 Joined: 22-August 05 From: Stockholm Sweden Member No.: 468 |
Since they have the 3d DEM data and know the geometry of the lighting they could easily divide out the shading from the images and create reasonably accurate albedomaps. Have anyone tried this?
Would be nice to have an "unshaded" dataset to be able to render the martian surface under any lighting condition. I used a stereo correlation software called "ZK stereo" to generate dems from the anaglyphs on the web but its not the greatest software in the world. it could really use some help from shape from shading to improve its solution... and using jpg compressed anaglyphs really doesnt help I made some simple flybys in open gl that where nice. But the garish colors that ESA used in their first releases really did not help the look too much... It looks to mee that esa is only using stereo correlation to make their dems. They should use shading information as well to improve the resolution. /M |
|
|
Jun 21 2006, 09:53 AM
Post
#18
|
|
Special Cookie Group: Members Posts: 2168 Joined: 6-April 05 From: Sintra | Portugal Member No.: 228 |
-------------------- "Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe |
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 07:16 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Swath Angle 29.1° Outer Stereo Angle ± 20.5° 520-760 nm Inner Stereo Angle ± 12° Nadir Channel 0° Blue Channel - 4.6° 435-520 nm Green Channel - 2.3° 522-592 nm Red Channel + 2.3° 626-686 nm IR Channel + 4.6° 780-850 nm I'm not sure how, if at all, that matches up with the space-borne version - but I've noticed some fairly extreme miss-matching just between the IR, G and B channels when looking at harsh elevation such as at Val.Mar. Has anyone been able to find something better than these figures? Doug |
|
|
Jul 8 2006, 04:31 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 15 Joined: 30-August 05 From: Paris, France Member No.: 481 |
Margaritifer Terra in full splendor: Nobody says anywhere on ESA site that this picture is a color anaglyph, in wrong rotation (we must rotate it 90° at right) or it's me ? Sacha (one of the thousands enjoyed lurkers) PS Thanks again for your upper smart forum I read dayly since MERs launches. And I apologyze one more time about my poor english. But I'm working hard |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 11:49 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |