Kepler Mission |
Kepler Mission |
Sep 27 2009, 04:27 AM
Post
#331
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
Since brightness of a star goes up as the fourth power of mass, it occurs to me that another problem presents itself: if a giant star did have a planet orbiting in the Goldilocks zone, that planet would have a period of decades or even centuries. There's simply no hope of seeing repeated transits.
--Greg |
|
|
Sep 27 2009, 01:30 PM
Post
#332
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1421 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 |
Indeed. Another thing to consider is that even if this planet is in the habitable zone, it hasn't been for long, and won't be much longer.
-------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
Sep 27 2009, 04:14 PM
Post
#333
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
The official objectives for Kepler aren't limited just to potentially habitable planets:
QUOTE Kepler Mission Scientific Objective: The scientific objective of the Kepler Mission is to explore the structure and diversity of planetary systems. This is achieved by surveying a large sample of stars to:
I personally think it would be quite interesting to learn what sort of planets, if any, orbit giant stars. However, it does seem that Kepler wouldn't be likely to find them, even if it were trying to -- for all the reasons we've already given. --Greg |
|
|
Sep 27 2009, 10:52 PM
Post
#334
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1421 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 |
I personally think it would be quite interesting to learn what sort of planets, if any, orbit giant stars. However, it does seem that Kepler wouldn't be likely to find them, even if it were trying to -- for all the reasons we've already given. Several planets have been discovered orbiting giant stars through radial velocity. So far, most of them have been gas giant planets, probably the result of the biased nature of the radial velocity method. -------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
Sep 28 2009, 03:40 AM
Post
#335
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
Several planets have been discovered orbiting giant stars through radial velocity. Not that I can tell. The most massive star listed in the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopedia has a mass 4.5 times that of the Sun. Giant stars start at 10x the mass of the Sun. http://www.exoplanet.eu/catalog-all.php?&a...=8&more=yes I'd be interested to learn otherwise, though. What's your source? EDIT: Nevermind; it's radius, not mass, and the Encyclopedia gives 21 like that -- none smaller than 2.6 times the mass of Jupiter. --Greg |
|
|
Sep 28 2009, 04:45 AM
Post
#336
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1421 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 |
the Encyclopedia gives 21 like that -- none smaller than 2.6 times the mass of Jupiter. Ah, that sounds right. I couldn't recall at the time I made my post if all of them were gas planets, or if there was a Neptune somewhere in there, thus the use of "most". -------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
Guest_PhilCo126_* |
Oct 4 2009, 09:14 AM
Post
#337
|
Guests |
During yesterday's Belgian Association for Astronomy's yearly meeting, some astronomers pointed out that the Kepler team will have to wait for the installation of new high precision spectrograph at Herschel Telescope at La Palma as HARPS in La Silla cannot reach Kepler's Field of View (Cygnus)...
|
|
|
Oct 15 2009, 10:30 PM
Post
#338
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
A new Mission Manager update at Kepler:
http://www.kepler.arc.nasa.gov/about/manager.html They're getting a handle on those earlier safing events -- something to do with a low-voltage power supply, but at least not a processor defect. No word on how they're planning to deal with it though. --Greg |
|
|
Nov 2 2009, 07:16 PM
Post
#339
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 646 Joined: 23-December 05 From: Forest of Dean Member No.: 617 |
-------------------- --
Viva software libre! |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 03:09 AM
Post
#340
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1582 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
I interpreted those reports to mean that data acquisition is fine... they just need new algorithms to massage the data, and writing the software will take a couple years. No?
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 04:00 AM
Post
#341
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 540 Joined: 17-November 05 From: Oklahoma Member No.: 557 |
The article mentioned uploading the new algorithms to Kepler. That would seem to me that the data processing change will occur on the spacecraft (assuming the article got it right). No telling what you can do with the data already on the ground, at least from this news item.
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 09:50 AM
Post
#342
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 131 Joined: 31-May 08 From: San Carlos, California, USA Member No.: 4168 |
I interpreted those reports to mean that data acquisition is fine... they just need new algorithms to massage the data, and writing the software will take a couple years. No? Sort of. I read it as... The data acquisition is ok but not as good as hoped. The data is noisier than hoped. The noise can be removed with software algorithms. The software will take a couple years to develop. It's a major bummer but it's also completely understandable. I really wish we could build another with all the kinks worked out and send it up next month, but that's just not the way it works. |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 02:23 PM
Post
#343
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 68 Joined: 10-September 05 Member No.: 493 |
Kepler mission uses double differential photometry?
-------------------- |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 02:24 PM
Post
#344
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1421 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 |
I'm pretty sure so.
-------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 02:32 PM
Post
#345
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 68 Joined: 10-September 05 Member No.: 493 |
I.e. already collected for 6 months photometry is not possible to fix, since the processing is on board a space ship?
-------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 30th April 2024 - 12:13 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |