Dawn Survey Orbit Phase, First orbital phase |
Dawn Survey Orbit Phase, First orbital phase |
Aug 19 2011, 07:52 PM
Post
#376
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 29-January 09 Member No.: 4589 |
That image was released 2 weeks ago -- why post it now? Was there something about it you wanted to discuss? Indeed - I wasn't paying sufficient attention to the date when I posted it. Mea culpa. -------------------- Protein structures and Mars fun - http://www.flickr.com/photos/nick960/
|
|
|
Aug 21 2011, 08:17 AM
Post
#377
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 52 Joined: 16-November 06 Member No.: 1364 |
Photojournal always has both TIFF and JPEG versions of an image. In rare, horrible cases, the TIFF has been made from a JPEG, but in most cases (including, as far as I can tell, Dawn), the TIFF is made from a file that was provided to the webmaster in some uncompressed format, and the lossily compressed JPEG made from that. I know for a fact that for Dawn, Photojournal TIFF images have been converted from JPEG. At least some, possibly not all. I am not so sure this only rarely happens. |
|
|
Aug 21 2011, 04:03 PM
Post
#378
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Well, shoot. That's stinky. But thank you very much for clearing that up. I guess the question then is where to get the least JPEGged images. I would assume that's still Photojournal.
-------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Aug 21 2011, 07:10 PM
Post
#379
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 404 Joined: 5-January 10 Member No.: 5161 |
I know for a fact that for Dawn, Photojournal TIFF images have been converted from JPEG. At least some, possibly not all. I am not so sure this only rarely happens. I've always wondered about this as well. One would assume that the spacecraft beams the images to earth in JPEG format, with at least a little compression rendered on the original, considering the bandwidth limitations. TIFF images take up many more kilobytes than JPEG, so I would be very surprised if TIFF images are generated on the spacecraft for transmitting to Earth. |
|
|
Aug 21 2011, 07:15 PM
Post
#380
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
One would assume that the spacecraft beams the images to earth in JPEG format Spacecraft transmit neither JPEG nor TIFF format down to Earth. Actual telemetry format of the files will look nothing like computer formats we use here on the ground. Depending on the lossy compression scheme used on the spacecraft the algorithm can be pretty close to JPEG, though. However, not all data has to be returned losslessly compressed. In short, the formats Photojournal uses have nothing to do with what spacecraft use. -------------------- |
|
|
Aug 21 2011, 07:18 PM
Post
#381
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 890 Joined: 18-November 08 Member No.: 4489 |
It has been my personal belief ,for the last 10 years, that jpeg should be illegal
it was good in replacing the 8 bit indexed gif back in the 90's and was good for 24k dial-up |
|
|
Aug 21 2011, 07:36 PM
Post
#382
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
I was hoping it would get replaced by jpeg2000 and dispose of those blocking artifacts, but alas it was not to be.
Anyway, we digress... -------------------- |
|
|
Aug 21 2011, 08:21 PM
Post
#383
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3233 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
For the record, I always send along PNGs when I have any product that would go into the Planetary Photojournal.
PNG FTW! -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Aug 21 2011, 08:23 PM
Post
#384
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 890 Joined: 18-November 08 Member No.: 4489 |
we could remove them
for image "PIA14673.jpg" the tiff is good before [attachment=25346:jpg.art1.png] after [attachment=25347:jpg.art2.png] gmic dose a good job, though some detail is lost . |
|
|
Aug 21 2011, 08:30 PM
Post
#385
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Aug 22 2011, 01:55 AM
Post
#386
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
New image release today has some more false-color fun!
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA14677 -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
Aug 22 2011, 04:03 AM
Post
#387
|
||
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
Hokay, played with this. Red and blue are 750 to 450 and 450 to 750. So took those two channels and created a grayscale image of each then overlayed them at 50%. Whaddya know, they come out almost to a bland 128 pixel blandness. Put both of those in red and blue channels. Then put the green channel of PIA14677 back in.
Green channel is 750 to 950 nm ratio. Fe absorbs at 1000 um. So Hi Fe will have a "Hi" ratio (bright). (Overaly HiPass filtered image for details, adjust green channel gamma and...) Et voila, a map of Fe minerals: Iron-O-Vision: Green is Fe enriched, magenta is Fe depleted. -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
||
Aug 22 2011, 04:08 AM
Post
#388
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
If I'm gonna guess, in this region there is a thin layer of Fe-enriched material. Mid-size recent craters dig this up and splat it on the surface as ejecta.
Bigger craters dig much deeper into an Fe-depleted layer and this lands on top of the other ejecta close to the crater. So the larger craters have an inner ejecta ring of Fe-depleted material (magenta) inside the Fe-enriched material. The uppermost poofy dust layer seems to be Fe-depleted. The landslides inside the crater also seem to be Fe-depleted (magenta). Just my guess.... -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
Aug 22 2011, 04:15 AM
Post
#389
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
Oooo, and notice how some of the craters in the lower part of the image have a touch of green at the center, but craters bigger than this don't. Those correspond to about 11 pixels, (x 450 m pixel) so, 5.3 km crater. Maybe indicating the Fe-rich layer is maybe only 4-5 km below the surface?
-------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
Aug 22 2011, 05:37 PM
Post
#390
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1729 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 05:46 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |