Live Dust Devil? |
Live Dust Devil? |
Guest_Sunspot_* |
May 28 2005, 03:25 PM
Post
#361
|
Guests |
Heres the JPL animation of the dust devil on sol 486
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/mer/images.cfm?id=1682 JPL .mov animation |
|
|
May 29 2005, 08:13 PM
Post
#362
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
Cool!!!
-------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
May 30 2005, 10:27 AM
Post
#363
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 477 Joined: 2-March 05 Member No.: 180 |
QUOTE (Sunspot @ May 28 2005, 11:25 AM) Heres the JPL animation of the dust devil on sol 486 http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/mer/images.cfm?id=1682 JPL .mov animation I wonder how big that thing got higher up - it cast a pretty large shadow around itself. |
|
|
May 30 2005, 11:54 AM
Post
#364
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 877 Joined: 7-March 05 From: Switzerland Member No.: 186 |
QUOTE (Jeff7 @ May 30 2005, 12:27 PM) The DD's local time was 11.48 a.m. at the beginning of the animation. I guess that is nearly sun culmination. Does someone know the angle that sun currently appears by culmination at Gusev? My guess for the DD's height is circa 170 meters. -------------------- |
|
|
May 30 2005, 04:38 PM
Post
#365
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 156 Joined: 18-March 05 From: Germany Member No.: 211 |
QUOTE (Tman @ May 30 2005, 11:54 AM) The DD's local time was 11.48 a.m. at the beginning of the animation. I guess that is nearly sun culmination. Does someone know the angle that sun currently appears by culmination at Gusev? My guess for the DD's height is circa 170 meters. Currently, the sun's culmination height is about 88° at Sprit's location (I used Guide 8). So it's directly overhead at midday. Twelve minutes earlier the sun's elevation is about 87°. So what we see is rather the horizontal extension of the dust devil projected onto the plain than its hight. Michael |
|
|
May 30 2005, 06:18 PM
Post
#366
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 877 Joined: 7-March 05 From: Switzerland Member No.: 186 |
Thanks! This sun position makes sense by comparing the whole course of the shadow. If so the DD was sometimes very wide in its higher part or it had sometime a rolling shape. Maybe about 100 meters wide, but I'm unsure which part of the DD the JPL caption means "about 35 meters in diameter".
-------------------- |
|
|
Jun 1 2005, 05:32 AM
Post
#367
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
Last DD (Sol-501) seems very far and huge! Here NavCam details of the same position taken about 3 min apart (no DD enhancement, only some retouch in order to improve luminosity/contrast and reduce jpeg artifacts):
In the last frame, DD base is only 6 pixel (0.28deg) below horizon... I do not remember actual height of Spirit above the plain, but assuming 50m, the distance should be about 10 Km, so DD width is at least 350m Do someone can confirm these numbers or/and make enhanced version? -------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
Jun 1 2005, 08:11 AM
Post
#368
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 118 Joined: 14-March 05 Member No.: 195 |
QUOTE (dilo @ Jun 1 2005, 05:32 AM) Last DD (Sol-501) seems very far and huge! Here NavCam details of the same position taken about 3 min apart (no DD enhancement, only some retouch in order to improve luminosity/contrast and reduce jpeg artifacts): In the last frame, DD base is only 6 pixel (0.28deg) below horizon... I do not remember actual height of Spirit above the plain, but assuming 50m, the distance should be about 10 Km, so DD width is at least 350m Do someone can confirm these numbers or/and make enhanced version? Wow cool stuff. I hope they catch one of those that etch the huge tracks you can see from space. |
|
|
Jun 1 2005, 09:43 AM
Post
#369
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 156 Joined: 18-March 05 From: Germany Member No.: 211 |
QUOTE (dilo @ Jun 1 2005, 05:32 AM) Assuming an elevation of 50 m I get the same results. The enhanced version looks like this: The dust in the left section does not belong to the big one which develops 100 s later. Looks like a devilish day at Gusev Crater The three large dd in frame 1 have diameters of 180, 160 and 260 m, approximately (see below). Also very interesting is the change of brightness between frames 4 and 5. Using an enhancement level of 20 it becomes obvious that there are very week dd moving through, which are almost invisible otherwise. Michael |
|
|
Jun 1 2005, 09:45 AM
Post
#370
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 593 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 279 |
QUOTE (dilo @ Jun 1 2005, 05:32 AM) In the last frame, DD base is only 6 pixel (0.28deg) below horizon... I do not remember actual height of Spirit above the plain, but assuming 50m, the distance should be about 10 Km, so DD width is at least 350m Do someone can confirm these numbers or/and make enhanced version? For the 16 degree field of view pancam, with 1024 pixels, I get 6 pixels equalling 0.09375 degrees. A little trigonometry: Horizon distance = SQRT((h*h)+(2*R*h)) ...where h is the height and R the radius of Mars (3397000 metres). If an object appears "n" pixels below a distant (and assumed flat) horizon, then the distance "x" to that object is given by: x = R*cos(A)+SQRT((R*R*cos(A)*cos(A))+(h*h)+(2*R*h)) ...where A is 90+(16*n/1024) degrees. So in this instance, if h is 50, then x is about 13.5 km. Gusev appears to be fairly flat, so the assumption feels about right. Andy G |
|
|
Jun 1 2005, 11:44 AM
Post
#371
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 156 Joined: 18-March 05 From: Germany Member No.: 211 |
QUOTE (AndyG @ Jun 1 2005, 09:45 AM) For the 16 degree field of view pancam, with 1024 pixels, I get 6 pixels equalling 0.09375 degrees. Thanks for these equations The dd images used here are Navcam images (2nd character of the file name is "N") which have a field of view of ~45 degrees. Therefore the angle per pixel is 45°/1024 px = 0.043945 °/px. Using that number for the calculation yields a distance of 8.5 km for the dust devil. Which is still close to 10 km. Michael |
|
|
Jun 1 2005, 12:05 PM
Post
#372
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 593 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 279 |
|
|
|
Jun 1 2005, 05:37 PM
Post
#373
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 723 Joined: 13-June 04 Member No.: 82 |
So these 'dust-devils' can reach 300m in diameter, and according to this website, Martian dust-devils can reach nearly 8km in height.. That seems awfully large for a dust-devil. From what I can find on the Web, on Earth the largest dust-devils reach about 100m in diameter, and maybe 1km in height.
It does seem to be the rule that on Mars, everything is an order of magnitude bigger than on Earth. Bill |
|
|
Jun 1 2005, 07:49 PM
Post
#374
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 345 Joined: 2-May 05 Member No.: 372 |
|
|
|
Jun 1 2005, 09:02 PM
Post
#375
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
Michael, your images are really impressive , congratulations!...
I'm amazed by clear stripes visible in the last animation, suggesting weak foreground DD... at this point, is very probable that Spirit pictured others like this in previous Sols but nobody noticed it up to now! Anyway, should be very interesting to take a PanCam image of the largest, bigger DD like last one! I think that it can be done through a modification of the "DD catcher software" already used fo NavCam... AndyG, can you kindly demonstrate the second formula you report? thanks... -------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th May 2024 - 11:49 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |